Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
57
FNEVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.12
Seasonality move
:
-2.02%
Day range:
$1.12 - $1.12
52-week range:
$0.75 - $1.14
Dividend yield:
3.66%
P/E ratio:
14.47x
P/S ratio:
1.01x
P/B ratio:
0.73x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
51.35%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$1.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNEVF
Fraser and Neave
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BUMTF
Bumitama Agri
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DTCK
Davis Commodities
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GNS
Genius Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEFDF
Delfi
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLMIY
Wilmar International
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNEVF
Fraser and Neave
|
$1.12 | -- | $1.6B | 14.47x | $0.01 | 3.66% | 1.01x |
|
BUMTF
Bumitama Agri
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DTCK
Davis Commodities
|
$0.99 | -- | $24.3M | 67.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.15x |
|
GNS
Genius Group
|
$0.59 | -- | $12.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.10x |
|
PEFDF
Delfi
|
$0.58 | -- | $354.5M | 8.72x | $0.02 | 6.55% | 0.69x |
|
WLMIY
Wilmar International
|
$22.18 | -- | $13.8B | 8.91x | $0.46 | 5.73% | 0.21x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNEVF
Fraser and Neave
|
28.91% | -0.556 | 52.6% | 1.26x |
|
BUMTF
Bumitama Agri
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DTCK
Davis Commodities
|
3.55% | -0.459 | 1.5% | 0.93x |
|
GNS
Genius Group
|
-- | 3.964 | -- | -- |
|
PEFDF
Delfi
|
11.05% | -0.873 | 8.22% | 1.24x |
|
WLMIY
Wilmar International
|
57.56% | -0.010 | 161.05% | 0.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNEVF
Fraser and Neave
|
-- | -- | 3.34% | 4.47% | -- | -- |
|
BUMTF
Bumitama Agri
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DTCK
Davis Commodities
|
-- | -- | 4.48% | 4.72% | -- | -- |
|
GNS
Genius Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEFDF
Delfi
|
-- | -- | 13.91% | 15.49% | -- | -- |
|
WLMIY
Wilmar International
|
-- | -- | 3% | 6.96% | -- | -- |
Fraser and Neave vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or BUMTF?
Bumitama Agri has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Bumitama Agri's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNEVFFraser and Neave-- -- $3.5B BUMTFBumitama Agri-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or BUMTF?
Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bumitama Agri has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fraser and Neave has higher upside potential than Bumitama Agri, analysts believe Fraser and Neave is more attractive than Bumitama Agri.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNEVFFraser and Neave0 0 0 BUMTFBumitama Agri0 0 0 -
Is FNEVF or BUMTF More Risky?
Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.235, which suggesting that the stock is 76.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bumitama Agri has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or BUMTF?
Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Bumitama Agri offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Bumitama Agri pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fraser and Neave's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or BUMTF?
Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bumitama Agri quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Bumitama Agri's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Bumitama Agri's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus -- for Bumitama Agri. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNEVFFraser and Neave1.01x 14.47x -- -- BUMTFBumitama Agri-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or DTCK?
Davis Commodities has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Davis Commodities's return on equity of 4.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNEVFFraser and Neave-- -- $3.5B DTCKDavis Commodities-- -- $12M -
What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or DTCK?
Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Davis Commodities has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fraser and Neave has higher upside potential than Davis Commodities, analysts believe Fraser and Neave is more attractive than Davis Commodities.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNEVFFraser and Neave0 0 0 DTCKDavis Commodities0 0 0 -
Is FNEVF or DTCK More Risky?
Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.235, which suggesting that the stock is 76.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Davis Commodities has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or DTCK?
Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Davis Commodities offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Davis Commodities pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fraser and Neave's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or DTCK?
Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Davis Commodities quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Davis Commodities's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Davis Commodities's PE ratio is 67.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus 0.15x for Davis Commodities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNEVFFraser and Neave1.01x 14.47x -- -- DTCKDavis Commodities0.15x 67.51x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or GNS?
Genius Group has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Genius Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNEVFFraser and Neave-- -- $3.5B GNSGenius Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or GNS?
Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genius Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8416.44%. Given that Genius Group has higher upside potential than Fraser and Neave, analysts believe Genius Group is more attractive than Fraser and Neave.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNEVFFraser and Neave0 0 0 GNSGenius Group0 0 0 -
Is FNEVF or GNS More Risky?
Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.235, which suggesting that the stock is 76.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genius Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or GNS?
Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Genius Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Genius Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fraser and Neave's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or GNS?
Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Genius Group quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Genius Group's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Genius Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus 0.10x for Genius Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNEVFFraser and Neave1.01x 14.47x -- -- GNSGenius Group0.10x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or PEFDF?
Delfi has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Delfi's return on equity of 15.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNEVFFraser and Neave-- -- $3.5B PEFDFDelfi-- -- $291.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or PEFDF?
Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Delfi has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fraser and Neave has higher upside potential than Delfi, analysts believe Fraser and Neave is more attractive than Delfi.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNEVFFraser and Neave0 0 0 PEFDFDelfi0 0 0 -
Is FNEVF or PEFDF More Risky?
Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.235, which suggesting that the stock is 76.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delfi has a beta of 0.024, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.591%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or PEFDF?
Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Delfi offers a yield of 6.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Delfi pays out 62.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or PEFDF?
Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Delfi quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Delfi's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Delfi's PE ratio is 8.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus 0.69x for Delfi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNEVFFraser and Neave1.01x 14.47x -- -- PEFDFDelfi0.69x 8.72x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or WLMIY?
Wilmar International has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Wilmar International's return on equity of 6.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNEVFFraser and Neave-- -- $3.5B WLMIYWilmar International-- -- $49.1B -
What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or WLMIY?
Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wilmar International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fraser and Neave has higher upside potential than Wilmar International, analysts believe Fraser and Neave is more attractive than Wilmar International.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNEVFFraser and Neave0 0 0 WLMIYWilmar International0 0 0 -
Is FNEVF or WLMIY More Risky?
Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.235, which suggesting that the stock is 76.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wilmar International has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.671%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or WLMIY?
Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Wilmar International offers a yield of 5.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Wilmar International pays out 52.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or WLMIY?
Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wilmar International quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Wilmar International's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Wilmar International's PE ratio is 8.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus 0.21x for Wilmar International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNEVFFraser and Neave1.01x 14.47x -- -- WLMIYWilmar International0.21x 8.91x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
