CHVKY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ucommune International has a net margin of -10.49% compared to China Vanke's net margin of --. China Vanke's return on equity of -4.91% beat Ucommune International's return on equity of -36.07%.

China Vanke has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ucommune International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Vanke has higher upside potential than Ucommune International, analysts believe China Vanke is more attractive than Ucommune International.

China Vanke has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ucommune International has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.534%.

China Vanke has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ucommune International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Vanke pays 181.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Ucommune International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Vanke quarterly revenues are $10.8B, which are larger than Ucommune International quarterly revenues of --. China Vanke's net income of -$1.1B is higher than Ucommune International's net income of --. Notably, China Vanke's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Ucommune International's PE ratio is 0.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Vanke is 0.14x versus 0.02x for Ucommune International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wetouch Technology has a net margin of -10.49% compared to China Vanke's net margin of 23.06%. China Vanke's return on equity of -4.91% beat Wetouch Technology's return on equity of 3.23%.

China Vanke has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wetouch Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Vanke has higher upside potential than Wetouch Technology, analysts believe China Vanke is more attractive than Wetouch Technology.

China Vanke has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wetouch Technology has a beta of 0.004, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.63%.

China Vanke has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wetouch Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Vanke pays 181.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Wetouch Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Vanke quarterly revenues are $10.8B, which are larger than Wetouch Technology quarterly revenues of $11.5M. China Vanke's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Wetouch Technology's net income of $2.7M. Notably, China Vanke's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Wetouch Technology's PE ratio is 6.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Vanke is 0.14x versus 0.48x for Wetouch Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XChange Tec has a net margin of -10.49% compared to China Vanke's net margin of --. China Vanke's return on equity of -4.91% beat XChange Tec's return on equity of --.

China Vanke has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XChange Tec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Vanke has higher upside potential than XChange Tec, analysts believe China Vanke is more attractive than XChange Tec.

China Vanke has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XChange Tec has a beta of -0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 178.484%.

China Vanke has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XChange Tec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Vanke pays 181.96% of its earnings as a dividend. XChange Tec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Vanke quarterly revenues are $10.8B, which are larger than XChange Tec quarterly revenues of --. China Vanke's net income of -$1.1B is higher than XChange Tec's net income of --. Notably, China Vanke's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while XChange Tec's PE ratio is 0.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Vanke is 0.14x versus -- for XChange Tec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xinyuan Real Estate has a net margin of -10.49% compared to China Vanke's net margin of --. China Vanke's return on equity of -4.91% beat Xinyuan Real Estate's return on equity of --.

China Vanke has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xinyuan Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2439.01%. Given that Xinyuan Real Estate has higher upside potential than China Vanke, analysts believe Xinyuan Real Estate is more attractive than China Vanke.

China Vanke has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xinyuan Real Estate has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.913%.

China Vanke has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xinyuan Real Estate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Vanke pays 181.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Xinyuan Real Estate pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Vanke quarterly revenues are $10.8B, which are larger than Xinyuan Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. China Vanke's net income of -$1.1B is higher than Xinyuan Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, China Vanke's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Xinyuan Real Estate's PE ratio is 0.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Vanke is 0.14x versus 0.03x for Xinyuan Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.