CGCLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Shin-Etsu Chemical has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Central Glass's net margin of --. Central Glass's return on equity of 11.52% beat Shin-Etsu Chemical's return on equity of --.

Central Glass has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shin-Etsu Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass has higher upside potential than Shin-Etsu Chemical, analysts believe Central Glass is more attractive than Shin-Etsu Chemical.

Central Glass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shin-Etsu Chemical has a beta of 1.318, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.814%.

Central Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Shin-Etsu Chemical offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Central Glass pays 27.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Shin-Etsu Chemical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Central Glass's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are larger than Shin-Etsu Chemical quarterly revenues of --. Central Glass's net income of $26.8M is higher than Shin-Etsu Chemical's net income of --. Notably, Central Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.60x while Shin-Etsu Chemical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass is 0.48x versus 4.21x for Shin-Etsu Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Chemical has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Central Glass's net margin of 5.29%. Central Glass's return on equity of 11.52% beat Sumitomo Chemical's return on equity of -19.13%.

Central Glass has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Chemical, analysts believe Central Glass is more attractive than Sumitomo Chemical.

Central Glass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Chemical has a beta of 0.285, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.495%.

Central Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Sumitomo Chemical offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Central Glass pays 27.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Chemical pays out -6.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Glass's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Sumitomo Chemical quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Central Glass's net income of $26.8M is lower than Sumitomo Chemical's net income of $230.2M. Notably, Central Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.60x while Sumitomo Chemical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass is 0.48x versus 0.21x for Sumitomo Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Central Glass's net margin of 9.96%. Central Glass's return on equity of 11.52% beat Sumitomo Osaka Cement's return on equity of 8.23%.

Central Glass has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Osaka Cement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Osaka Cement, analysts believe Central Glass is more attractive than Sumitomo Osaka Cement.

Central Glass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Central Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Sumitomo Osaka Cement offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Central Glass pays 27.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Osaka Cement pays out 26.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Sumitomo Osaka Cement quarterly revenues of $377.3M. Central Glass's net income of $26.8M is lower than Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net income of $37.6M. Notably, Central Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.60x while Sumitomo Osaka Cement's PE ratio is 8.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass is 0.48x versus 0.58x for Sumitomo Osaka Cement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiheiyo Cement has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Central Glass's net margin of 9.32%. Central Glass's return on equity of 11.52% beat Taiheiyo Cement's return on equity of 10.64%.

Central Glass has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Taiheiyo Cement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass has higher upside potential than Taiheiyo Cement, analysts believe Central Glass is more attractive than Taiheiyo Cement.

Central Glass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiheiyo Cement has a beta of 0.566, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.359%.

Central Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Taiheiyo Cement offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Central Glass pays 27.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiheiyo Cement pays out 18.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Taiheiyo Cement quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Central Glass's net income of $26.8M is lower than Taiheiyo Cement's net income of $145.6M. Notably, Central Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.60x while Taiheiyo Cement's PE ratio is 6.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass is 0.48x versus 0.47x for Taiheiyo Cement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.