BRGAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elkem ASA has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Borregaard ASA's net margin of 1.19%. Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 16.67% beat Elkem ASA's return on equity of 0.15%.

Borregaard ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Elkem ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Borregaard ASA has higher upside potential than Elkem ASA, analysts believe Borregaard ASA is more attractive than Elkem ASA.

Borregaard ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elkem ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Borregaard ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Elkem ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Borregaard ASA pays 37.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Elkem ASA pays out 5298.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Borregaard ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Elkem ASA's is not.

Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues are $181.4M, which are smaller than Elkem ASA quarterly revenues of $719.2M. Borregaard ASA's net income of $23.3M is higher than Elkem ASA's net income of $8.6M. Notably, Borregaard ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.15x while Elkem ASA's PE ratio is 264.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borregaard ASA is 2.55x versus 0.35x for Elkem ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Borregaard ASA's net margin of 6.57%. Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 16.67% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 10.76%.

Borregaard ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.49%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Borregaard ASA, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Borregaard ASA.

Borregaard ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.687%.

Borregaard ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Borregaard ASA pays 37.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 22.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues are $181.4M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $9.3M. Borregaard ASA's net income of $23.3M is higher than Flexible Solutions International's net income of $611.9K. Notably, Borregaard ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.15x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 10.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borregaard ASA is 2.55x versus 1.16x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Borregaard ASA's net margin of 1.58%. Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 16.67% beat Norsk Hydro ASA's return on equity of 0.04%.

Borregaard ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norsk Hydro ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 77.42%. Given that Norsk Hydro ASA has higher upside potential than Borregaard ASA, analysts believe Norsk Hydro ASA is more attractive than Borregaard ASA.

Borregaard ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norsk Hydro ASA has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.114%.

Borregaard ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Norsk Hydro ASA offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Borregaard ASA pays 37.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Norsk Hydro ASA pays out 350.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Borregaard ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Norsk Hydro ASA's is not.

Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues are $181.4M, which are smaller than Norsk Hydro ASA quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Borregaard ASA's net income of $23.3M is lower than Norsk Hydro ASA's net income of $73.8M. Notably, Borregaard ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.15x while Norsk Hydro ASA's PE ratio is 1,159.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borregaard ASA is 2.55x versus 0.62x for Norsk Hydro ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yara International ASA has a net margin of 12.83% compared to Borregaard ASA's net margin of 7.89%. Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 16.67% beat Yara International ASA's return on equity of 7.38%.

Borregaard ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yara International ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Borregaard ASA has higher upside potential than Yara International ASA, analysts believe Borregaard ASA is more attractive than Yara International ASA.

Borregaard ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yara International ASA has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.573%.

Borregaard ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Yara International ASA offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Borregaard ASA pays 37.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Yara International ASA pays out 2747.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Borregaard ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Yara International ASA's is not.

Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues are $181.4M, which are smaller than Yara International ASA quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Borregaard ASA's net income of $23.3M is lower than Yara International ASA's net income of $285M. Notably, Borregaard ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.15x while Yara International ASA's PE ratio is 12.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borregaard ASA is 2.55x versus 0.48x for Yara International ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.