BRDCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Bridgestone's net margin of --. Bridgestone's return on equity of 8.8% beat Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09%.

Bridgestone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridgestone has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe Bridgestone is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Bridgestone has a beta of 0.521, which suggesting that the stock is 47.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bridgestone has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Linkage Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridgestone pays 39.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgestone's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridgestone quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Linkage Global quarterly revenues of --. Bridgestone's net income of $361.2M is higher than Linkage Global's net income of --. Notably, Bridgestone's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.09x while Linkage Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgestone is 0.80x versus 0.91x for Linkage Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Bridgestone's net margin of --. Bridgestone's return on equity of 8.8% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's return on equity of --.

Bridgestone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridgestone has higher upside potential than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, analysts believe Bridgestone is more attractive than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies.

Bridgestone has a beta of 0.521, which suggesting that the stock is 47.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bridgestone has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridgestone pays 39.25% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgestone's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridgestone quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Bridgestone's net income of $361.2M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Bridgestone's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.09x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's PE ratio is 53.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgestone is 0.80x versus 0.12x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Bridgestone's net margin of --. Bridgestone's return on equity of 8.8% beat Tokyo Lifestyle's return on equity of 19.93%.

Bridgestone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridgestone has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle, analysts believe Bridgestone is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle.

Bridgestone has a beta of 0.521, which suggesting that the stock is 47.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bridgestone has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Tokyo Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridgestone pays 39.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgestone's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridgestone quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle quarterly revenues of --. Bridgestone's net income of $361.2M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle's net income of --. Notably, Bridgestone's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.09x while Tokyo Lifestyle's PE ratio is 1.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgestone is 0.80x versus 0.06x for Tokyo Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Bridgestone's net margin of 5.01%. Bridgestone's return on equity of 8.8% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 12.15%.

Bridgestone has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of $231.94 which suggests that it could grow by 27.84%. Given that Toyota Motor has higher upside potential than Bridgestone, analysts believe Toyota Motor is more attractive than Bridgestone.

Bridgestone has a beta of 0.521, which suggesting that the stock is 47.889% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.329%.

Bridgestone has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share. Bridgestone pays 39.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridgestone quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $77B. Bridgestone's net income of $361.2M is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $3.9B. Notably, Bridgestone's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.09x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 8.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgestone is 0.80x versus 0.79x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.