ATZAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citi Trends has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Aritzia's net margin of -3.99%. Aritzia's return on equity of 9.95% beat Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37%.

Aritzia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -55.42%. On the other hand Citi Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.86%. Given that Citi Trends has higher upside potential than Aritzia, analysts believe Citi Trends is more attractive than Aritzia.

Aritzia has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citi Trends has a beta of 2.366, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.632%.

Aritzia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citi Trends offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citi Trends pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aritzia quarterly revenues are $365.8M, which are larger than Citi Trends quarterly revenues of $179.1M. Aritzia's net income of $11.6M is higher than Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Aritzia's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.60x while Citi Trends's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia is 2.35x versus 0.28x for Citi Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

E Automotive has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Aritzia's net margin of -8.77%. Aritzia's return on equity of 9.95% beat E Automotive's return on equity of -39.06%.

Aritzia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -55.42%. On the other hand E Automotive has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aritzia has higher upside potential than E Automotive, analysts believe Aritzia is more attractive than E Automotive.

Aritzia has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison E Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aritzia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. E Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. E Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aritzia quarterly revenues are $365.8M, which are larger than E Automotive quarterly revenues of $29.5M. Aritzia's net income of $11.6M is higher than E Automotive's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Aritzia's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.60x while E Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia is 2.35x versus 0.04x for E Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Aritzia's net margin of 9.64%. Aritzia's return on equity of 9.95% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 42.62%.

Aritzia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -55.42%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $161.73 which suggests that it could grow by 12.31%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Aritzia, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Aritzia.

Aritzia has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.501%.

Aritzia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Aritzia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aritzia quarterly revenues are $365.8M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Aritzia's net income of $11.6M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $488.8M. Notably, Aritzia's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.60x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 23.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia is 2.35x versus 2.36x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Aritzia's net margin of 7.56%. Aritzia's return on equity of 9.95% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Aritzia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -55.42%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could fall by -14.05%. Given that Aritzia has more downside risk than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Urban Outfitters is more attractive than Aritzia.

Aritzia has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.524%.

Aritzia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aritzia quarterly revenues are $365.8M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Aritzia's net income of $11.6M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Aritzia's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.60x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia is 2.35x versus 0.96x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.