ASPU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of -- compared to Aspen Group's net margin of 17.4%. Aspen Group's return on equity of -- beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 30.82%.

Aspen Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 971.43%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $158.33 which suggests that it could grow by 12.08%. Given that Aspen Group has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Aspen Group is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Aspen Group has a beta of 1.514, which suggesting that the stock is 51.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.053%.

Aspen Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspen Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspen Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $238.3M. Aspen Group's net income of -- is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $41.5M. Notably, Aspen Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Group is 0.05x versus 4.64x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mynd.ai has a net margin of -- compared to Aspen Group's net margin of --. Aspen Group's return on equity of -- beat Mynd.ai's return on equity of -68.39%.

Aspen Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 971.43%. On the other hand Mynd.ai has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aspen Group has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Aspen Group is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Aspen Group has a beta of 1.514, which suggesting that the stock is 51.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.075%.

Aspen Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mynd.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share. Aspen Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mynd.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspen Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mynd.ai quarterly revenues of --. Aspen Group's net income of -- is lower than Mynd.ai's net income of --. Notably, Aspen Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mynd.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Group is 0.05x versus 0.24x for Mynd.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of -- compared to Aspen Group's net margin of 22.53%. Aspen Group's return on equity of -- beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 15.25%.

Aspen Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 971.43%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.47%. Given that Aspen Group has higher upside potential than Perdoceo Education, analysts believe Aspen Group is more attractive than Perdoceo Education.

Aspen Group has a beta of 1.514, which suggesting that the stock is 51.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.878%.

Aspen Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Aspen Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 9.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aspen Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Aspen Group's net income of -- is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $38.3M. Notably, Aspen Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 13.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Group is 0.05x versus 2.69x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of -- compared to Aspen Group's net margin of 9.07%. Aspen Group's return on equity of -- beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 7.63%.

Aspen Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 971.43%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $123.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.69%. Given that Aspen Group has higher upside potential than Strategic Education, analysts believe Aspen Group is more attractive than Strategic Education.

Aspen Group has a beta of 1.514, which suggesting that the stock is 51.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.587, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.32%.

Aspen Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Aspen Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 84.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aspen Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $306M. Aspen Group's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Education's net income of $27.7M. Notably, Aspen Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 17.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Group is 0.05x versus 1.84x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.