NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
37
ASEJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.26
Seasonality move
:
10.41%
Day range:
$0.26 - $0.26
52-week range:
$0.22 - $0.32
Dividend yield:
9.26%
P/E ratio:
8.61x
P/S ratio:
2.37x
P/B ratio:
0.32x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
698
1-year change:
1%
Market cap:
$243.9M
Revenue:
$106.5M
EPS (TTM):
$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASEJF
APT Satellite Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ICLK
iClick Interactive Asia Group
|
$42.7M | -$0.70 | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCWY
PCCW
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QMMM
QMMM Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UCL
Ucloudlink Group
|
$26.1M | $0.07 | 15.05% | -100% | -- |
|
VSME
VS Media Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASEJF
APT Satellite Holdings
|
$0.26 | -- | $243.9M | 8.61x | $0.01 | 9.26% | 2.37x |
|
ICLK
iClick Interactive Asia Group
|
$8.11 | -- | $71M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.63x |
|
PCCWY
PCCW
|
$5.31 | -- | $4.1B | -- | $0.13 | 9.22% | 0.86x |
|
QMMM
QMMM Holdings
|
$0.61 | -- | $10.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.99x |
|
UCL
Ucloudlink Group
|
$2.07 | -- | $77.6M | 12.73x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.89x |
|
VSME
VS Media Holdings
|
$1.01 | -- | $3.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASEJF
APT Satellite Holdings
|
-- | -1.194 | 0.69% | 9.98x |
|
ICLK
iClick Interactive Asia Group
|
53.69% | 8.157 | 295.34% | 0.67x |
|
PCCWY
PCCW
|
90.52% | 0.230 | 181.98% | 0.32x |
|
QMMM
QMMM Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 0.37x |
|
UCL
Ucloudlink Group
|
15.11% | 2.765 | 7.78% | 1.17x |
|
VSME
VS Media Holdings
|
-- | -2.460 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASEJF
APT Satellite Holdings
|
-- | -- | 3.67% | 3.67% | -- | -- |
|
ICLK
iClick Interactive Asia Group
|
-- | -- | -20.83% | -39.12% | -- | -- |
|
PCCWY
PCCW
|
-- | -- | -0.34% | -2.35% | -- | -- |
|
QMMM
QMMM Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UCL
Ucloudlink Group
|
$12.2M | $2.2M | 18.39% | 22.69% | 13.3% | $2M |
|
VSME
VS Media Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
APT Satellite Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ASEJF or ICLK?
iClick Interactive Asia Group has a net margin of -- compared to APT Satellite Holdings's net margin of --. APT Satellite Holdings's return on equity of 3.67% beat iClick Interactive Asia Group's return on equity of -39.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings-- -- $772.2M ICLKiClick Interactive Asia Group-- -- $70.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ASEJF or ICLK?
APT Satellite Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iClick Interactive Asia Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -50.68%. Given that iClick Interactive Asia Group has higher upside potential than APT Satellite Holdings, analysts believe iClick Interactive Asia Group is more attractive than APT Satellite Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings0 0 0 ICLKiClick Interactive Asia Group0 0 0 -
Is ASEJF or ICLK More Risky?
APT Satellite Holdings has a beta of -0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 127.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iClick Interactive Asia Group has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.229%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASEJF or ICLK?
APT Satellite Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.26%. iClick Interactive Asia Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. APT Satellite Holdings pays 84.71% of its earnings as a dividend. iClick Interactive Asia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. APT Satellite Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASEJF or ICLK?
APT Satellite Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iClick Interactive Asia Group quarterly revenues of --. APT Satellite Holdings's net income of -- is lower than iClick Interactive Asia Group's net income of --. Notably, APT Satellite Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while iClick Interactive Asia Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APT Satellite Holdings is 2.37x versus 0.63x for iClick Interactive Asia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings2.37x 8.61x -- -- ICLKiClick Interactive Asia Group0.63x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASEJF or PCCWY?
PCCW has a net margin of -- compared to APT Satellite Holdings's net margin of --. APT Satellite Holdings's return on equity of 3.67% beat PCCW's return on equity of -2.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings-- -- $772.2M PCCWYPCCW-- -- $8B -
What do Analysts Say About ASEJF or PCCWY?
APT Satellite Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PCCW has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that APT Satellite Holdings has higher upside potential than PCCW, analysts believe APT Satellite Holdings is more attractive than PCCW.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings0 0 0 PCCWYPCCW0 0 0 -
Is ASEJF or PCCWY More Risky?
APT Satellite Holdings has a beta of -0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 127.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PCCW has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.949%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASEJF or PCCWY?
APT Satellite Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.26%. PCCW offers a yield of 9.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. APT Satellite Holdings pays 84.71% of its earnings as a dividend. PCCW pays out -1352.12% of its earnings as a dividend. APT Satellite Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASEJF or PCCWY?
APT Satellite Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PCCW quarterly revenues of --. APT Satellite Holdings's net income of -- is lower than PCCW's net income of --. Notably, APT Satellite Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while PCCW's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APT Satellite Holdings is 2.37x versus 0.86x for PCCW. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings2.37x 8.61x -- -- PCCWYPCCW0.86x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASEJF or QMMM?
QMMM Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to APT Satellite Holdings's net margin of --. APT Satellite Holdings's return on equity of 3.67% beat QMMM Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings-- -- $772.2M QMMMQMMM Holdings-- -- -$1.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ASEJF or QMMM?
APT Satellite Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand QMMM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that APT Satellite Holdings has higher upside potential than QMMM Holdings, analysts believe APT Satellite Holdings is more attractive than QMMM Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings0 0 0 QMMMQMMM Holdings0 0 0 -
Is ASEJF or QMMM More Risky?
APT Satellite Holdings has a beta of -0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 127.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison QMMM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASEJF or QMMM?
APT Satellite Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.26%. QMMM Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. APT Satellite Holdings pays 84.71% of its earnings as a dividend. QMMM Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. APT Satellite Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASEJF or QMMM?
APT Satellite Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than QMMM Holdings quarterly revenues of --. APT Satellite Holdings's net income of -- is lower than QMMM Holdings's net income of --. Notably, APT Satellite Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while QMMM Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APT Satellite Holdings is 2.37x versus 2.99x for QMMM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings2.37x 8.61x -- -- QMMMQMMM Holdings2.99x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASEJF or UCL?
Ucloudlink Group has a net margin of -- compared to APT Satellite Holdings's net margin of 13.46%. APT Satellite Holdings's return on equity of 3.67% beat Ucloudlink Group's return on equity of 22.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings-- -- $772.2M UCLUcloudlink Group48.39% $0.10 $26.4M -
What do Analysts Say About ASEJF or UCL?
APT Satellite Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ucloudlink Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 334.78%. Given that Ucloudlink Group has higher upside potential than APT Satellite Holdings, analysts believe Ucloudlink Group is more attractive than APT Satellite Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings0 0 0 UCLUcloudlink Group1 0 0 -
Is ASEJF or UCL More Risky?
APT Satellite Holdings has a beta of -0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 127.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ucloudlink Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASEJF or UCL?
APT Satellite Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.26%. Ucloudlink Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. APT Satellite Holdings pays 84.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Ucloudlink Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. APT Satellite Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASEJF or UCL?
APT Satellite Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ucloudlink Group quarterly revenues of $25.2M. APT Satellite Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Ucloudlink Group's net income of $3.4M. Notably, APT Satellite Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Ucloudlink Group's PE ratio is 12.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APT Satellite Holdings is 2.37x versus 0.89x for Ucloudlink Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings2.37x 8.61x -- -- UCLUcloudlink Group0.89x 12.73x $25.2M $3.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns ASEJF or VSME?
VS Media Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to APT Satellite Holdings's net margin of --. APT Satellite Holdings's return on equity of 3.67% beat VS Media Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings-- -- $772.2M VSMEVS Media Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASEJF or VSME?
APT Satellite Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VS Media Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that APT Satellite Holdings has higher upside potential than VS Media Holdings, analysts believe APT Satellite Holdings is more attractive than VS Media Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings0 0 0 VSMEVS Media Holdings0 0 0 -
Is ASEJF or VSME More Risky?
APT Satellite Holdings has a beta of -0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 127.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VS Media Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASEJF or VSME?
APT Satellite Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.26%. VS Media Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. APT Satellite Holdings pays 84.71% of its earnings as a dividend. VS Media Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. APT Satellite Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASEJF or VSME?
APT Satellite Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VS Media Holdings quarterly revenues of --. APT Satellite Holdings's net income of -- is lower than VS Media Holdings's net income of --. Notably, APT Satellite Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while VS Media Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APT Satellite Holdings is 2.37x versus -- for VS Media Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASEJFAPT Satellite Holdings2.37x 8.61x -- -- VSMEVS Media Holdings-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 6.77% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 15% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.74% over the past day.
