APMRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Dominion Access SA has a net margin of -- compared to Amper SA's net margin of --. Amper SA's return on equity of -- beat Global Dominion Access SA's return on equity of 11.68%.

Amper SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Dominion Access SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amper SA has higher upside potential than Global Dominion Access SA, analysts believe Amper SA is more attractive than Global Dominion Access SA.

Amper SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Dominion Access SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amper SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Dominion Access SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Amper SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Dominion Access SA pays out 39.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Dominion Access SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amper SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Dominion Access SA quarterly revenues of --. Amper SA's net income of -- is lower than Global Dominion Access SA's net income of --. Notably, Amper SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Dominion Access SA's PE ratio is 12.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amper SA is 0.34x versus 0.38x for Global Dominion Access SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Indra Sistemas SA has a net margin of -- compared to Amper SA's net margin of 6.4%. Amper SA's return on equity of -- beat Indra Sistemas SA's return on equity of 20.99%.

Amper SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Indra Sistemas SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amper SA has higher upside potential than Indra Sistemas SA, analysts believe Amper SA is more attractive than Indra Sistemas SA.

Amper SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Indra Sistemas SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amper SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Indra Sistemas SA offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Amper SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Indra Sistemas SA pays out 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Indra Sistemas SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amper SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Indra Sistemas SA quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Amper SA's net income of -- is lower than Indra Sistemas SA's net income of $77.1M. Notably, Amper SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Indra Sistemas SA's PE ratio is 11.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amper SA is 0.34x versus 0.60x for Indra Sistemas SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Turbo Energy SA has a net margin of -- compared to Amper SA's net margin of --. Amper SA's return on equity of -- beat Turbo Energy SA's return on equity of -113.29%.

Amper SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Turbo Energy SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amper SA has higher upside potential than Turbo Energy SA, analysts believe Amper SA is more attractive than Turbo Energy SA.

Amper SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Turbo Energy SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amper SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Turbo Energy SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amper SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Turbo Energy SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amper SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Turbo Energy SA quarterly revenues of --. Amper SA's net income of -- is lower than Turbo Energy SA's net income of --. Notably, Amper SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Turbo Energy SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amper SA is 0.34x versus 1.59x for Turbo Energy SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wallbox NV has a net margin of -- compared to Amper SA's net margin of --. Amper SA's return on equity of -- beat Wallbox NV's return on equity of -72.54%.

Amper SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wallbox NV has an analysts' consensus of $3.43 which suggests that it could grow by 211.18%. Given that Wallbox NV has higher upside potential than Amper SA, analysts believe Wallbox NV is more attractive than Amper SA.

Amper SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wallbox NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amper SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wallbox NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amper SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wallbox NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amper SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wallbox NV quarterly revenues of --. Amper SA's net income of -- is lower than Wallbox NV's net income of --. Notably, Amper SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wallbox NV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amper SA is 0.34x versus 0.57x for Wallbox NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.