Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Sell
30
ANCTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$55.82
Seasonality move
:
-2.17%
Day range:
$55.64 - $55.96
52-week range:
$51.26 - $64.34
Dividend yield:
0.71%
P/E ratio:
20.73x
P/S ratio:
0.74x
P/B ratio:
3.80x
Volume:
27.9K
Avg. volume:
99K
1-year change:
-2.43%
Market cap:
$53.1B
Revenue:
$69.3B
EPS (TTM):
$2.70
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard
|
$18B | -- | 9.51% | -- | $70.80 |
|
BGI
Birks Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$344.4M | -$0.15 | -8.75% | -52.61% | -- |
|
EICCF
E Automotive
|
$32.7M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$38.3M | -- | 19.89% | -- | -- |
|
SRSCQ
Sears Canada
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard
|
$55.96 | $70.80 | $53.1B | 20.73x | $0.14 | 0.71% | 0.74x |
|
BGI
Birks Group
|
$1.61 | -- | $31.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.24x |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$53.13 | -- | $438.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.27x |
|
EICCF
E Automotive
|
$0.0800 | -- | $4.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.04x |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$7.32 | -- | $190.2M | 30.48x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.16x |
|
SRSCQ
Sears Canada
|
$0.0000 | -- | $1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard
|
41.8% | 0.977 | 20.13% | 0.67x |
|
BGI
Birks Group
|
109.08% | 1.606 | 173.04% | 0.06x |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
58.05% | 2.151 | 237.58% | 4.25x |
|
EICCF
E Automotive
|
6.02% | 161,957.155 | 100.93% | 0.86x |
|
ELA
Envela
|
21.31% | 2.153 | 9.71% | 2.00x |
|
SRSCQ
Sears Canada
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard
|
$3.2B | $1B | 11.16% | 18.99% | 6.26% | $818.3M |
|
BGI
Birks Group
|
-- | -- | -7.15% | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$174.1M | $25.2M | -0.32% | -0.82% | 7.25% | -$23.6M |
|
EICCF
E Automotive
|
$14.6M | -$3.7M | -40.59% | -39.06% | -6.91% | -- |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$11.5M | $2M | 10.11% | 13.11% | 5.03% | $1.5M |
|
SRSCQ
Sears Canada
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Alimentation Couche-Tard vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or BGI?
Birks Group has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of --. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 18.99% beat Birks Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard18.1% $0.75 $24.1B BGIBirks Group-- -- $67M -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus price target of $70.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.95%. On the other hand Birks Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher upside potential than Birks Group, analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more attractive than Birks Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard1 0 0 BGIBirks Group0 0 0 -
Is ANCTF or BGI More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.754%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Birks Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Birks Group quarterly revenues of --. Alimentation Couche-Tard's net income of $708.8M is higher than Birks Group's net income of --. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Birks Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard is 0.74x versus 0.24x for Birks Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard0.74x 20.73x $17.4B $708.8M BGIBirks Group0.24x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or CRMT?
America's Car-Mart has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 1.47%. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 18.99% beat America's Car-Mart's return on equity of -0.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard18.1% $0.75 $24.1B CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart50.12% $0.61 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or CRMT?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus price target of $70.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.95%. On the other hand America's Car-Mart has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.95%. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher upside potential than America's Car-Mart, analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more attractive than America's Car-Mart.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard1 0 0 CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart0 3 0 -
Is ANCTF or CRMT More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison America's Car-Mart has a beta of 1.679, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or CRMT?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. America's Car-Mart offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. America's Car-Mart pays out -0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or CRMT?
Alimentation Couche-Tard quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than America's Car-Mart quarterly revenues of $347.3M. Alimentation Couche-Tard's net income of $708.8M is higher than America's Car-Mart's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while America's Car-Mart's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard is 0.74x versus 0.27x for America's Car-Mart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard0.74x 20.73x $17.4B $708.8M CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart0.27x -- $347.3M $5.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or EICCF?
E Automotive has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of -8.77%. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 18.99% beat E Automotive's return on equity of -39.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard18.1% $0.75 $24.1B EICCFE Automotive49.59% -$0.04 $80M -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or EICCF?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus price target of $70.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.95%. On the other hand E Automotive has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher upside potential than E Automotive, analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more attractive than E Automotive.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard1 0 0 EICCFE Automotive0 0 0 -
Is ANCTF or EICCF More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison E Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or EICCF?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. E Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. E Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or EICCF?
Alimentation Couche-Tard quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than E Automotive quarterly revenues of $29.5M. Alimentation Couche-Tard's net income of $708.8M is higher than E Automotive's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while E Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard is 0.74x versus 0.04x for E Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard0.74x 20.73x $17.4B $708.8M EICCFE Automotive0.04x -- $29.5M -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or ELA?
Envela has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 3.59%. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 18.99% beat Envela's return on equity of 13.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard18.1% $0.75 $24.1B ELAEnvela24.44% $0.06 $65M -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or ELA?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus price target of $70.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.95%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.36%. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more attractive than Envela.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard1 0 0 ELAEnvela0 0 0 -
Is ANCTF or ELA More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.983%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or ELA?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or ELA?
Alimentation Couche-Tard quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $46.9M. Alimentation Couche-Tard's net income of $708.8M is higher than Envela's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Envela's PE ratio is 30.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard is 0.74x versus 1.16x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard0.74x 20.73x $17.4B $708.8M ELAEnvela1.16x 30.48x $46.9M $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or SRSCQ?
Sears Canada has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of --. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 18.99% beat Sears Canada's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard18.1% $0.75 $24.1B SRSCQSears Canada-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or SRSCQ?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus price target of $70.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.95%. On the other hand Sears Canada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher upside potential than Sears Canada, analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more attractive than Sears Canada.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard1 0 0 SRSCQSears Canada0 0 0 -
Is ANCTF or SRSCQ More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sears Canada has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or SRSCQ?
Alimentation Couche-Tard has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Sears Canada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Sears Canada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or SRSCQ?
Alimentation Couche-Tard quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Sears Canada quarterly revenues of --. Alimentation Couche-Tard's net income of $708.8M is higher than Sears Canada's net income of --. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Sears Canada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard is 0.74x versus 0.00x for Sears Canada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard0.74x 20.73x $17.4B $708.8M SRSCQSears Canada0.00x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
