ALMMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gulf Resources has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of -155.77%. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 10.01% beat Gulf Resources's return on equity of -49.67%.

Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gulf Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2345.61%. Given that Gulf Resources has higher upside potential than Aluminum Corp of China, analysts believe Gulf Resources is more attractive than Aluminum Corp of China.

Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.185, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.497%.

Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Gulf Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 51.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulf Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $8.8B, which are larger than Gulf Resources quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $279.4M is higher than Gulf Resources's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.76x while Gulf Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.33x versus 0.49x for Gulf Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of -7.87%. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 10.01% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.89%.

Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp of China has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe Aluminum Corp of China is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.

Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.623, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.348%.

Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 51.72% of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $8.8B, which are larger than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $25.1M. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $279.4M is higher than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$2M. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.76x while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.33x versus 0.07x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ReTo Eco-Solutions has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of --. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 10.01% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions's return on equity of -85.96%.

Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp of China has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, analysts believe Aluminum Corp of China is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions.

Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.078%.

Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. ReTo Eco-Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 51.72% of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $8.8B, which are larger than ReTo Eco-Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $279.4M is higher than ReTo Eco-Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.76x while ReTo Eco-Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.33x versus 0.46x for ReTo Eco-Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Origin Agritech has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of --. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 10.01% beat Origin Agritech's return on equity of --.

Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Agritech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp of China has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech, analysts believe Aluminum Corp of China is more attractive than Origin Agritech.

Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech has a beta of 1.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.321%.

Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Origin Agritech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 51.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $8.8B, which are larger than Origin Agritech quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $279.4M is higher than Origin Agritech's net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.76x while Origin Agritech's PE ratio is 2.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.33x versus 0.88x for Origin Agritech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.