AFCJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to AFC Ajax NV's net margin of -217.55%. AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of -4.57%.

AFC Ajax NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.97%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than AFC Ajax NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than AFC Ajax NV.

AFC Ajax NV has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.045%.

AFC Ajax NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AFC Ajax NV pays -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $43.3M. AFC Ajax NV's net income of -- is lower than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$94.2M. Notably, AFC Ajax NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 267.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AFC Ajax NV is 1.21x versus 0.89x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prosus NV has a net margin of -- compared to AFC Ajax NV's net margin of --. AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98% beat Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13%.

AFC Ajax NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prosus NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AFC Ajax NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe AFC Ajax NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

AFC Ajax NV has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prosus NV has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.128%.

AFC Ajax NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prosus NV offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. AFC Ajax NV pays -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV pays out 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Prosus NV quarterly revenues of --. AFC Ajax NV's net income of -- is lower than Prosus NV's net income of --. Notably, AFC Ajax NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prosus NV's PE ratio is 13.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AFC Ajax NV is 1.21x versus 17.68x for Prosus NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Music Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to AFC Ajax NV's net margin of --. AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98% beat Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 51.03%.

AFC Ajax NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Music Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AFC Ajax NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe AFC Ajax NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

AFC Ajax NV has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AFC Ajax NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Music Group NV offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. AFC Ajax NV pays -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV pays out 73.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues of --. AFC Ajax NV's net income of -- is lower than Universal Music Group NV's net income of --. Notably, AFC Ajax NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Universal Music Group NV's PE ratio is 28.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AFC Ajax NV is 1.21x versus 3.82x for Universal Music Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VEON has a net margin of -- compared to AFC Ajax NV's net margin of 6.62%. AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98% beat VEON's return on equity of --.

AFC Ajax NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VEON has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.72%. Given that VEON has higher upside potential than AFC Ajax NV, analysts believe VEON is more attractive than AFC Ajax NV.

AFC Ajax NV has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VEON has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.443%.

AFC Ajax NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VEON offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AFC Ajax NV pays -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. VEON pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VEON quarterly revenues of $1B. AFC Ajax NV's net income of -- is lower than VEON's net income of $68M. Notably, AFC Ajax NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VEON's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AFC Ajax NV is 1.21x versus 0.69x for VEON. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.