Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
47
YEAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.53
Seasonality move
:
0.17%
Day range:
$50.49 - $50.55
52-week range:
$50.18 - $50.92
Dividend yield:
5.1%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
227.3K
Avg. volume:
123.7K
1-year change:
0.13%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
|
$50.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 5.1% | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
$50.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 5.82% | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
$50.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 5.32% | -- |
|
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
|
$50.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 5.21% | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
$100.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 5.27% | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
$75.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 5.34% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | 0.122 | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -0.015 | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | 0.087 | -- | -- |
|
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
|
-- | 0.070 | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | 0.004 | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | 0.039 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
AB Ultra Short Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or FLOT?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or FLOT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or FLOT More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.070, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.019%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or FLOT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or FLOT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or GSY?
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or GSY?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or GSY More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has a beta of 0.114, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.58%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or GSY?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF offers a yield of 5.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or GSY?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or JPST?
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- JPSTJPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or JPST?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 JPSTJPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or JPST More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.554%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or JPST?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF offers a yield of 5.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or JPST?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- JPSTJPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or MINT?
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or MINT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or MINT More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has a beta of 0.103, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.661%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or MINT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr offers a yield of 5.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or MINT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or RAVI?
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or RAVI?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or RAVI More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has a beta of 0.093, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.662%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or RAVI?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund offers a yield of 5.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or RAVI?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 0.98% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.24% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 1.7% over the past day.
