How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Sell
45
TINY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$45.40
Seasonality move
:
6.21%
Day range:
$45.13 - $45.72
52-week range:
$39.35 - $55.98
Dividend yield:
0.17%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
436
Avg. volume:
1K
1-year change:
9.37%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IDAT
iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
$45.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.17% | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
$21.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.16% | -- |
|
IDAT
iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF
|
$33.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.7% | -- |
|
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
|
$25.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.36% | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
$33.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 1.48% | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
$30.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.13% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | 1.785 | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | 1.970 | -- | -- |
|
IDAT
iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.171 | -- | -- |
|
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
|
-- | 1.274 | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.089 | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IDAT
iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or BULD?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or BULD More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or IDAT?
iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- IDATiShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or IDAT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 IDATiShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or IDAT More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or IDAT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or IDAT?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- IDATiShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or ODDS?
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- ODDSPacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or ODDS?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 ODDSPacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or ODDS More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or ODDS?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or ODDS?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- ODDSPacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or PSWD?
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or PSWD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or PSWD More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or PSWD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or PSWD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or SPAM?
Themes Cybersecurity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Themes Cybersecurity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or SPAM?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Themes Cybersecurity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Themes Cybersecurity ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Themes Cybersecurity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or SPAM More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Themes Cybersecurity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or SPAM?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Themes Cybersecurity ETF offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Themes Cybersecurity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or SPAM?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Themes Cybersecurity ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Themes Cybersecurity ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Themes Cybersecurity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Themes Cybersecurity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
57
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
64
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
64
QMCO alert for Dec 27
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
65
ALGS alert for Dec 27
Aligos Therapeutics [ALGS] is up 10.88% over the past day.
