Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…
Sell
14
TINT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$29.12
Seasonality move
:
0.18%
Day range:
$29.66 - $29.72
52-week range:
$29.12 - $34.72
Dividend yield:
1.44%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
203
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-11.05%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
$29.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.44% | -- |
|
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
|
$23.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 2.87% | -- |
|
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF
|
$12.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 4.17% | -- |
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
$25.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.72% | -- |
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
$64.58 | -- | -- | -- | $2.20 | 3.41% | -- |
|
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
|
$75.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 2.11% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.049 | -- | -- |
|
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
|
-- | 0.877 | -- | -- |
|
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF
|
-- | 0.767 | -- | -- |
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | 0.457 | -- | -- |
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | 1.124 | -- | -- |
|
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
|
-- | 1.407 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or FTAG?
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- FTAGFirst Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or FTAG?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 FTAGFirst Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or FTAG More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or FTAG?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or FTAG?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- FTAGFirst Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or FTRI?
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- FTRIFirst Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or FTRI?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 FTRIFirst Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or FTRI More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.704%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or FTRI?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or FTRI?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- FTRIFirst Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or ION?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or ION?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or ION More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or ION?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or ION?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or MOO?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Agribusiness ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or MOO?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Agribusiness ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Agribusiness ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than VanEck Agribusiness ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or MOO More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.505%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or MOO?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. VanEck Agribusiness ETF offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.20 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Agribusiness ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or MOO?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Agribusiness ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Agribusiness ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Agribusiness ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or WOOD?
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- WOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or WOOD?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 WOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or WOOD More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.679%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or WOOD?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or WOOD?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- WOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?
Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) has enjoyed its position as a…
Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 9
IonQ [IONQ] is down 38.82% over the past day.
Sell
40
QMCO alert for Jan 9
Quantum [QMCO] is down 30.08% over the past day.
Sell
47
MATW alert for Jan 9
Matthews International [MATW] is up 14.21% over the past day.
