ZETA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoubleVerify Holdings has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 12.28%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04% beat DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.77, signalling upside risk potential of 188.3%. On the other hand DoubleVerify Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.24 which suggests that it could grow by 60.99%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoubleVerify Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleVerify Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are larger than DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues of $190.6M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M is lower than DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DoubleVerify Holdings's PE ratio is 40.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.23x versus 3.34x for DoubleVerify Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flywire has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -13.53%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04% beat Flywire's return on equity of 0.36%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.77, signalling upside risk potential of 188.3%. On the other hand Flywire has an analysts' consensus of $15.17 which suggests that it could grow by 77.8%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Flywire, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than Flywire.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flywire has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flywire offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flywire pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are larger than Flywire quarterly revenues of $117.6M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M is higher than Flywire's net income of -$15.9M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flywire's PE ratio is 853.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.23x versus 2.19x for Flywire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HubSpot has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 0.71%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04% beat HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.77, signalling upside risk potential of 188.3%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $836.76 which suggests that it could grow by 58.54%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.821, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.13%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are smaller than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $703.2M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M is higher than HubSpot's net income of $5M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is 5,864.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.23x versus 10.47x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RingCentral has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -1.17%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04% beat RingCentral's return on equity of --.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.77, signalling upside risk potential of 188.3%. On the other hand RingCentral has an analysts' consensus of $37.44 which suggests that it could grow by 63.51%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than RingCentral.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral has a beta of 1.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.131%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RingCentral offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are smaller than RingCentral quarterly revenues of $614.5M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M is higher than RingCentral's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RingCentral's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.23x versus 0.88x for RingCentral. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.