TRTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BrightSpire Capital has a net margin of 31.16% compared to TPG RE Finance Trust's net margin of -24.55%. TPG RE Finance Trust's return on equity of 6.63% beat BrightSpire Capital's return on equity of -11.58%.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.57%. On the other hand BrightSpire Capital has an analysts' consensus of $7.38 which suggests that it could grow by 29.84%. Given that BrightSpire Capital has higher upside potential than TPG RE Finance Trust, analysts believe BrightSpire Capital is more attractive than TPG RE Finance Trust.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a beta of 2.236, which suggesting that the stock is 123.578% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BrightSpire Capital has a beta of 2.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.233%.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.97%. BrightSpire Capital offers a yield of 12.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. TPG RE Finance Trust pays 121.66% of its earnings as a dividend. BrightSpire Capital pays out -75.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

TPG RE Finance Trust quarterly revenues are $34.3M, which are smaller than BrightSpire Capital quarterly revenues of $80.4M. TPG RE Finance Trust's net income of $10.7M is higher than BrightSpire Capital's net income of -$19.7M. Notably, TPG RE Finance Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.69x while BrightSpire Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TPG RE Finance Trust is 4.26x versus 2.10x for BrightSpire Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Industrial Logistics Properties Trust has a net margin of 31.16% compared to TPG RE Finance Trust's net margin of -21.81%. TPG RE Finance Trust's return on equity of 6.63% beat Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's return on equity of -8.82%.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.57%. On the other hand Industrial Logistics Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 186.53%. Given that Industrial Logistics Properties Trust has higher upside potential than TPG RE Finance Trust, analysts believe Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is more attractive than TPG RE Finance Trust.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a beta of 2.236, which suggesting that the stock is 123.578% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Industrial Logistics Properties Trust has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.697%.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.97%. Industrial Logistics Properties Trust offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. TPG RE Finance Trust pays 121.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Industrial Logistics Properties Trust pays out -2.76% of its earnings as a dividend.

TPG RE Finance Trust quarterly revenues are $34.3M, which are smaller than Industrial Logistics Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $110.5M. TPG RE Finance Trust's net income of $10.7M is higher than Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's net income of -$24.1M. Notably, TPG RE Finance Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.69x while Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TPG RE Finance Trust is 4.26x versus 0.52x for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JBG SMITH Properties has a net margin of 31.16% compared to TPG RE Finance Trust's net margin of -45.8%. TPG RE Finance Trust's return on equity of 6.63% beat JBG SMITH Properties's return on equity of -5.81%.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.57%. On the other hand JBG SMITH Properties has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.5%. Given that TPG RE Finance Trust has higher upside potential than JBG SMITH Properties, analysts believe TPG RE Finance Trust is more attractive than JBG SMITH Properties.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a beta of 2.236, which suggesting that the stock is 123.578% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JBG SMITH Properties has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.94%.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.97%. JBG SMITH Properties offers a yield of 5.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. TPG RE Finance Trust pays 121.66% of its earnings as a dividend. JBG SMITH Properties pays out -43.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

TPG RE Finance Trust quarterly revenues are $34.3M, which are smaller than JBG SMITH Properties quarterly revenues of $130.8M. TPG RE Finance Trust's net income of $10.7M is higher than JBG SMITH Properties's net income of -$59.9M. Notably, TPG RE Finance Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.69x while JBG SMITH Properties's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TPG RE Finance Trust is 4.26x versus 2.57x for JBG SMITH Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 31.16% compared to TPG RE Finance Trust's net margin of -2883.88%. TPG RE Finance Trust's return on equity of 6.63% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.57%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TPG RE Finance Trust has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe TPG RE Finance Trust is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a beta of 2.236, which suggesting that the stock is 123.578% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TPG RE Finance Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.97%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TPG RE Finance Trust pays 121.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TPG RE Finance Trust quarterly revenues are $34.3M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. TPG RE Finance Trust's net income of $10.7M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, TPG RE Finance Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.69x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TPG RE Finance Trust is 4.26x versus -- for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.