TDW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Barnwell Industries has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Tidewater's net margin of -44.12%. Tidewater's return on equity of 17.06% beat Barnwell Industries's return on equity of -34.19%.

Tidewater has a consensus price target of $89.67, signalling upside risk potential of 53.92%. On the other hand Barnwell Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tidewater has higher upside potential than Barnwell Industries, analysts believe Tidewater is more attractive than Barnwell Industries.

Tidewater has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.241% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barnwell Industries has a beta of 0.023, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.665%.

Tidewater has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Barnwell Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Tidewater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barnwell Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tidewater quarterly revenues are $340.4M, which are larger than Barnwell Industries quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Tidewater's net income of $46.4M is higher than Barnwell Industries's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Tidewater's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while Barnwell Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tidewater is 2.31x versus 0.72x for Barnwell Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CKX Lands has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Tidewater's net margin of 31.6%. Tidewater's return on equity of 17.06% beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 2.51%.

Tidewater has a consensus price target of $89.67, signalling upside risk potential of 53.92%. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tidewater has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe Tidewater is more attractive than CKX Lands.

Tidewater has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.241% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of 0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.133%.

Tidewater has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tidewater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tidewater quarterly revenues are $340.4M, which are larger than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $171.3K. Tidewater's net income of $46.4M is higher than CKX Lands's net income of $54.1K. Notably, Tidewater's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 53.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tidewater is 2.31x versus 11.95x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Petroleum has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Tidewater's net margin of -38.8%. Tidewater's return on equity of 17.06% beat Empire Petroleum's return on equity of -56.67%.

Tidewater has a consensus price target of $89.67, signalling upside risk potential of 53.92%. On the other hand Empire Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tidewater has higher upside potential than Empire Petroleum, analysts believe Tidewater is more attractive than Empire Petroleum.

Tidewater has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.241% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Petroleum has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.489%.

Tidewater has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Empire Petroleum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tidewater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Petroleum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tidewater quarterly revenues are $340.4M, which are larger than Empire Petroleum quarterly revenues of $10.2M. Tidewater's net income of $46.4M is higher than Empire Petroleum's net income of -$4M. Notably, Tidewater's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while Empire Petroleum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tidewater is 2.31x versus 4.48x for Empire Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Energy has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Tidewater's net margin of -45.33%. Tidewater's return on equity of 17.06% beat US Energy's return on equity of -75.29%.

Tidewater has a consensus price target of $89.67, signalling upside risk potential of 53.92%. On the other hand US Energy has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.53%. Given that Tidewater has higher upside potential than US Energy, analysts believe Tidewater is more attractive than US Energy.

Tidewater has a beta of 1.062, which suggesting that the stock is 6.241% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Energy has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.182%.

Tidewater has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Tidewater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Energy pays out -3.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tidewater quarterly revenues are $340.4M, which are larger than US Energy quarterly revenues of $5M. Tidewater's net income of $46.4M is higher than US Energy's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Tidewater's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while US Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tidewater is 2.31x versus 2.12x for US Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.