Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Sell
45
SRV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$44.00
Seasonality move
:
-2.88%
Day range:
$42.29 - $43.49
52-week range:
$33.46 - $47.34
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
32.5K
Avg. volume:
51K
1-year change:
28.57%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NTG
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
$43.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 0% | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
$45.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 7.37% | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
$30.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 4.48% | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
$12.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.54% | -- |
|
NTG
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
|
$53.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 3.8% | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
$42.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 8.86% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | 1.770 | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | 1.047 | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | 0.596 | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | 1.039 | -- | -- |
|
NTG
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
|
-- | 0.801 | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | 1.017 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NTG
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or EMO?
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or EMO?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund0 0 0 -
Is SRV or EMO More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a beta of 2.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.64%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or EMO?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund offers a yield of 7.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or EMO?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or ENFR?
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or ENFR?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF0 0 0 -
Is SRV or ENFR More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.513%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or ENFR?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or ENFR?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or KYN?
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or KYN?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,0 0 0 -
Is SRV or KYN More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a beta of 1.734, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.374%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or KYN?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, offers a yield of 6.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or KYN?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or NTG?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or NTG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc., analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SRV or NTG More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a beta of 2.754, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.399%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or NTG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or NTG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or TYG?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or TYG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 -
Is SRV or TYG More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.473%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or TYG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure offers a yield of 8.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or TYG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
