Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
49
SQNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.88
Seasonality move
:
6.88%
Day range:
$2.78 - $2.89
52-week range:
$0.85 - $7.43
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
0.54x
P/S ratio:
2.01x
P/B ratio:
1.26x
Volume:
72.6K
Avg. volume:
141.6K
1-year change:
-59.01%
Market cap:
$72.2M
Revenue:
$33.6M
EPS (TTM):
$5.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQNS
Sequans Communications SA
|
$4.8M | -$0.38 | 119.99% | -90% | -- |
|
CGEMY
Capgemini SE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DAVA
Endava PLC
|
$253.7M | $0.28 | 9.81% | 81% | $50.80 |
|
HKD
AMTD Digital
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTLS
Materialise NV
|
$72.2M | $0.03 | 8.82% | -64.52% | -- |
|
SAP
SAP SE
|
$9.2B | $1.31 | 7.77% | 38.95% | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQNS
Sequans Communications SA
|
$2.89 | -- | $72.2M | 0.54x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.01x |
|
CGEMY
Capgemini SE
|
$32.35 | -- | $26.7B | 15.75x | $0.74 | 2.28% | 1.20x |
|
DAVA
Endava PLC
|
$30.30 | $50.80 | $1.8B | 220.52x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.88x |
|
HKD
AMTD Digital
|
$2.61 | -- | $501.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MTLS
Materialise NV
|
$7.45 | -- | $440.1M | 40.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.50x |
|
SAP
SAP SE
|
$247.90 | -- | $289.2B | 99.65x | $2.39 | 0.96% | 8.07x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQNS
Sequans Communications SA
|
64.39% | -2.269 | 139.72% | 1.32x |
|
CGEMY
Capgemini SE
|
34.44% | 1.314 | 18.07% | 1.14x |
|
DAVA
Endava PLC
|
17.47% | 1.684 | 11.77% | 1.90x |
|
HKD
AMTD Digital
|
-- | 0.661 | -- | -- |
|
MTLS
Materialise NV
|
15.46% | 0.390 | 15.59% | 1.54x |
|
SAP
SAP SE
|
20.92% | 0.734 | 4.55% | 0.97x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQNS
Sequans Communications SA
|
$8.3M | -$9.2M | 45.55% | 769.14% | -90.88% | -$3.3M |
|
CGEMY
Capgemini SE
|
-- | -- | 10.06% | 15.97% | -- | -- |
|
DAVA
Endava PLC
|
$63.3M | $6.1M | 1.01% | 1.11% | 2.41% | $4.2M |
|
HKD
AMTD Digital
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTLS
Materialise NV
|
$43.2M | $4.7M | 3.5% | 4.27% | 7.31% | -$341.5K |
|
SAP
SAP SE
|
$6.8B | $2.4B | 5.25% | 6.43% | 28.24% | $1.5B |
Sequans Communications SA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SQNS or CGEMY?
Capgemini SE has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of --. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 769.14% beat Capgemini SE's return on equity of 15.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQNSSequans Communications SA82.47% $6.53 $161.3M CGEMYCapgemini SE-- -- $17.8B -
What do Analysts Say About SQNS or CGEMY?
Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 159.52%. On the other hand Capgemini SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than Capgemini SE, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than Capgemini SE.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQNSSequans Communications SA0 0 0 CGEMYCapgemini SE0 0 0 -
Is SQNS or CGEMY More Risky?
Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capgemini SE has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.704%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQNS or CGEMY?
Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capgemini SE offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capgemini SE pays out 33.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Capgemini SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQNS or CGEMY?
Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are larger than Capgemini SE quarterly revenues of --. Sequans Communications SA's net income of $72.3M is higher than Capgemini SE's net income of --. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while Capgemini SE's PE ratio is 15.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.01x versus 1.20x for Capgemini SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQNSSequans Communications SA2.01x 0.54x $10.1M $72.3M CGEMYCapgemini SE1.20x 15.75x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SQNS or DAVA?
Endava PLC has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of 1.15%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 769.14% beat Endava PLC's return on equity of 1.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQNSSequans Communications SA82.47% $6.53 $161.3M DAVAEndava PLC24.95% $0.05 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About SQNS or DAVA?
Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 159.52%. On the other hand Endava PLC has an analysts' consensus of $50.80 which suggests that it could grow by 25.07%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than Endava PLC, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than Endava PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQNSSequans Communications SA0 0 0 DAVAEndava PLC7 5 0 -
Is SQNS or DAVA More Risky?
Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endava PLC has a beta of 1.242, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.164%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQNS or DAVA?
Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Endava PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Endava PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQNS or DAVA?
Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than Endava PLC quarterly revenues of $253.8M. Sequans Communications SA's net income of $72.3M is higher than Endava PLC's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while Endava PLC's PE ratio is 220.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.01x versus 1.88x for Endava PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQNSSequans Communications SA2.01x 0.54x $10.1M $72.3M DAVAEndava PLC1.88x 220.52x $253.8M $2.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SQNS or HKD?
AMTD Digital has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of --. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 769.14% beat AMTD Digital's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQNSSequans Communications SA82.47% $6.53 $161.3M HKDAMTD Digital-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SQNS or HKD?
Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 159.52%. On the other hand AMTD Digital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than AMTD Digital, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than AMTD Digital.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQNSSequans Communications SA0 0 0 HKDAMTD Digital0 0 0 -
Is SQNS or HKD More Risky?
Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMTD Digital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQNS or HKD?
Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMTD Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMTD Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQNS or HKD?
Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are larger than AMTD Digital quarterly revenues of --. Sequans Communications SA's net income of $72.3M is higher than AMTD Digital's net income of --. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while AMTD Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.01x versus -- for AMTD Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQNSSequans Communications SA2.01x 0.54x $10.1M $72.3M HKDAMTD Digital-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SQNS or MTLS?
Materialise NV has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of 4.44%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 769.14% beat Materialise NV's return on equity of 4.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQNSSequans Communications SA82.47% $6.53 $161.3M MTLSMaterialise NV57.24% $0.05 $326.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SQNS or MTLS?
Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 159.52%. On the other hand Materialise NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.99%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than Materialise NV, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than Materialise NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQNSSequans Communications SA0 0 0 MTLSMaterialise NV0 0 0 -
Is SQNS or MTLS More Risky?
Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Materialise NV has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.607%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQNS or MTLS?
Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Materialise NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Materialise NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQNS or MTLS?
Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than Materialise NV quarterly revenues of $75.5M. Sequans Communications SA's net income of $72.3M is higher than Materialise NV's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while Materialise NV's PE ratio is 40.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.01x versus 1.50x for Materialise NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQNSSequans Communications SA2.01x 0.54x $10.1M $72.3M MTLSMaterialise NV1.50x 40.32x $75.5M $3.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns SQNS or SAP?
SAP SE has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of 17.27%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 769.14% beat SAP SE's return on equity of 6.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQNSSequans Communications SA82.47% $6.53 $161.3M SAPSAP SE73.34% $1.36 $58.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SQNS or SAP?
Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 159.52%. On the other hand SAP SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.86%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than SAP SE, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than SAP SE.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQNSSequans Communications SA0 0 0 SAPSAP SE2 6 0 -
Is SQNS or SAP More Risky?
Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SAP SE has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.402%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQNS or SAP?
Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SAP SE offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.39 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SAP SE pays out 39.01% of its earnings as a dividend. SAP SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQNS or SAP?
Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $10.1M, which are smaller than SAP SE quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Sequans Communications SA's net income of $72.3M is lower than SAP SE's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while SAP SE's PE ratio is 99.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.01x versus 8.07x for SAP SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQNSSequans Communications SA2.01x 0.54x $10.1M $72.3M SAPSAP SE8.07x 99.65x $9.3B $1.6B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
