REXR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Concept Energy has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Rexford Industrial Realty's net margin of -10.81%. Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.83%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a consensus price target of $49.50, signalling upside risk potential of 27.87%. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than New Concept Energy.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.296, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.439%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rexford Industrial Realty pays 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues are $241.8M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $37K. Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M is higher than New Concept Energy's net income of -$4K. Notably, Rexford Industrial Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.47x while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rexford Industrial Realty is 9.22x versus 40.50x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mid-America Apartment Communities has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Rexford Industrial Realty's net margin of 20.9%. Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34% beat Mid-America Apartment Communities's return on equity of 8.34%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a consensus price target of $49.50, signalling upside risk potential of 27.87%. On the other hand Mid-America Apartment Communities has an analysts' consensus of $165.10 which suggests that it could grow by 7.77%. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than Mid-America Apartment Communities, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than Mid-America Apartment Communities.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mid-America Apartment Communities has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.276%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. Mid-America Apartment Communities offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.47 per share. Rexford Industrial Realty pays 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Mid-America Apartment Communities pays out 118.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues are $241.8M, which are smaller than Mid-America Apartment Communities quarterly revenues of $551.1M. Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M is lower than Mid-America Apartment Communities's net income of $115.2M. Notably, Rexford Industrial Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.47x while Mid-America Apartment Communities's PE ratio is 34.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rexford Industrial Realty is 9.22x versus 8.22x for Mid-America Apartment Communities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMH Properties has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Rexford Industrial Realty's net margin of 21.37%. Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34% beat UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a consensus price target of $49.50, signalling upside risk potential of 27.87%. On the other hand UMH Properties has an analysts' consensus of $21.57 which suggests that it could grow by 16.4%. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than UMH Properties, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than UMH Properties.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMH Properties has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.093%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. UMH Properties offers a yield of 4.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Rexford Industrial Realty pays 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. UMH Properties pays out 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues are $241.8M, which are larger than UMH Properties quarterly revenues of $60.7M. Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M is higher than UMH Properties's net income of $13M. Notably, Rexford Industrial Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.47x while UMH Properties's PE ratio is 144.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rexford Industrial Realty is 9.22x versus 5.65x for UMH Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.P. Carey has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Rexford Industrial Realty's net margin of 28.11%. Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34% beat W.P. Carey's return on equity of 6.38%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a consensus price target of $49.50, signalling upside risk potential of 27.87%. On the other hand W.P. Carey has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.41%. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than W.P. Carey, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than W.P. Carey.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.P. Carey has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.394%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. W.P. Carey offers a yield of 6.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Rexford Industrial Realty pays 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. W.P. Carey pays out 129.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues are $241.8M, which are smaller than W.P. Carey quarterly revenues of $397.4M. Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M is lower than W.P. Carey's net income of $111.7M. Notably, Rexford Industrial Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.47x while W.P. Carey's PE ratio is 21.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rexford Industrial Realty is 9.22x versus 7.55x for W.P. Carey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.