What Do Tesla Delivery Numbers Mean for Tesla Stock?
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) released Q1 delivery numbers, showing a substantial slowdown…
Sell
50
QBTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.26
Seasonality move
:
54.29%
Day range:
$7.02 - $7.60
52-week range:
$0.75 - $11.95
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
157.77x
P/B ratio:
33.72x
Volume:
30.9M
Avg. volume:
72.7M
1-year change:
323.98%
Market cap:
$2.1B
Revenue:
$8.8M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.69
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum
|
$10.5M | -$0.04 | 326% | -67.27% | $9.58 |
|
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
|
$96.9M | $0.89 | 4.8% | 48.33% | $136.00 |
|
MSFT
Microsoft
|
$68.5B | $3.23 | 11.98% | 13.26% | $499.16 |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$38.1B | $0.85 | 66.5% | 55.48% | $167.78 |
|
PD
PagerDuty
|
$119.5M | $0.16 | 7.02% | -- | $20.20 |
|
PLUS
ePlus
|
$523.9M | $0.87 | -3.15% | -0.98% | $77.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum
|
$7.25 | $9.58 | $2.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 157.77x |
|
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
|
$105.25 | $136.00 | $483.9M | 25.92x | $0.17 | 0.65% | 1.01x |
|
MSFT
Microsoft
|
$388.45 | $499.16 | $2.9T | 31.28x | $0.83 | 0.81% | 11.09x |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$110.93 | $167.78 | $2.7T | 37.76x | $0.01 | 0.04% | 21.09x |
|
PD
PagerDuty
|
$15.47 | $20.20 | $1.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.04x |
|
PLUS
ePlus
|
$58.23 | $77.00 | $1.5B | 14.85x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.73x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum
|
32.73% | 1.367 | 1.36% | 5.95x |
|
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
|
0.82% | 2.389 | 0.13% | 1.00x |
|
MSFT
Microsoft
|
12.94% | 1.134 | 1.43% | 1.10x |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
9.64% | 1.716 | 0.29% | 3.67x |
|
PD
PagerDuty
|
77.64% | 1.440 | 26.43% | 1.84x |
|
PLUS
ePlus
|
13.45% | 0.722 | 7.58% | 1.52x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum
|
$1.5M | -$20.2M | -311.27% | -- | -3709.83% | $1.1M |
|
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
|
$31.2M | $12.8M | 22.45% | 22.73% | 7.94% | $14.1M |
|
MSFT
Microsoft
|
$47.8B | $31.7B | 28.42% | 34.34% | 43.03% | $6.5B |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$28.7B | $24B | 107.08% | 123.32% | 64.27% | $15.6B |
|
PD
PagerDuty
|
$101.5M | -$11.7M | -6.96% | -25.94% | -5.55% | $28.6M |
|
PLUS
ePlus
|
$140.9M | $29M | 9.78% | 11.36% | 6.4% | $64.2M |
D-Wave Quantum vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns QBTS or CLMB?
Climb Global Solutions has a net margin of -3727.89% compared to D-Wave Quantum's net margin of 4.32%. D-Wave Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBTSD-Wave Quantum63.79% -$0.37 $93.1M CLMBClimb Global Solutions19.32% $1.52 $91.3M -
What do Analysts Say About QBTS or CLMB?
D-Wave Quantum has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.18%. On the other hand Climb Global Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $136.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.22%. Given that D-Wave Quantum has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, analysts believe D-Wave Quantum is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBTSD-Wave Quantum3 0 0 CLMBClimb Global Solutions0 0 0 -
Is QBTS or CLMB More Risky?
D-Wave Quantum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.198%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QBTS or CLMB?
D-Wave Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Climb Global Solutions offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. D-Wave Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions pays out 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QBTS or CLMB?
D-Wave Quantum quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues of $161.8M. D-Wave Quantum's net income of -$86.1M is lower than Climb Global Solutions's net income of $7M. Notably, D-Wave Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Climb Global Solutions's PE ratio is 25.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for D-Wave Quantum is 157.77x versus 1.01x for Climb Global Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBTSD-Wave Quantum157.77x -- $2.3M -$86.1M CLMBClimb Global Solutions1.01x 25.92x $161.8M $7M
-
Which has Higher Returns QBTS or MSFT?
Microsoft has a net margin of -3727.89% compared to D-Wave Quantum's net margin of 34.62%. D-Wave Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBTSD-Wave Quantum63.79% -$0.37 $93.1M MSFTMicrosoft68.69% $3.23 $347.7B -
What do Analysts Say About QBTS or MSFT?
D-Wave Quantum has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.18%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $499.16 which suggests that it could grow by 28.5%. Given that D-Wave Quantum has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe D-Wave Quantum is more attractive than Microsoft.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBTSD-Wave Quantum3 0 0 MSFTMicrosoft39 6 0 -
Is QBTS or MSFT More Risky?
D-Wave Quantum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QBTS or MSFT?
D-Wave Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. D-Wave Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QBTS or MSFT?
D-Wave Quantum quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. D-Wave Quantum's net income of -$86.1M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, D-Wave Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for D-Wave Quantum is 157.77x versus 11.09x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBTSD-Wave Quantum157.77x -- $2.3M -$86.1M MSFTMicrosoft11.09x 31.28x $69.6B $24.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns QBTS or NVDA?
NVIDIA has a net margin of -3727.89% compared to D-Wave Quantum's net margin of 56.17%. D-Wave Quantum's return on equity of -- beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBTSD-Wave Quantum63.79% -$0.37 $93.1M NVDANVIDIA73.03% $0.89 $87.8B -
What do Analysts Say About QBTS or NVDA?
D-Wave Quantum has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.18%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $167.78 which suggests that it could grow by 51.25%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than D-Wave Quantum, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than D-Wave Quantum.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBTSD-Wave Quantum3 0 0 NVDANVIDIA45 6 0 -
Is QBTS or NVDA More Risky?
D-Wave Quantum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QBTS or NVDA?
D-Wave Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. D-Wave Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QBTS or NVDA?
D-Wave Quantum quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. D-Wave Quantum's net income of -$86.1M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, D-Wave Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for D-Wave Quantum is 157.77x versus 21.09x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBTSD-Wave Quantum157.77x -- $2.3M -$86.1M NVDANVIDIA21.09x 37.76x $39.3B $22.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns QBTS or PD?
PagerDuty has a net margin of -3727.89% compared to D-Wave Quantum's net margin of -7.21%. D-Wave Quantum's return on equity of -- beat PagerDuty's return on equity of -25.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBTSD-Wave Quantum63.79% -$0.37 $93.1M PDPagerDuty83.55% -$0.12 $598.8M -
What do Analysts Say About QBTS or PD?
D-Wave Quantum has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.18%. On the other hand PagerDuty has an analysts' consensus of $20.20 which suggests that it could grow by 30.58%. Given that D-Wave Quantum has higher upside potential than PagerDuty, analysts believe D-Wave Quantum is more attractive than PagerDuty.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBTSD-Wave Quantum3 0 0 PDPagerDuty3 6 0 -
Is QBTS or PD More Risky?
D-Wave Quantum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PagerDuty has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QBTS or PD?
D-Wave Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PagerDuty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. D-Wave Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PagerDuty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QBTS or PD?
D-Wave Quantum quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than PagerDuty quarterly revenues of $121.4M. D-Wave Quantum's net income of -$86.1M is lower than PagerDuty's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, D-Wave Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PagerDuty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for D-Wave Quantum is 157.77x versus 3.04x for PagerDuty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBTSD-Wave Quantum157.77x -- $2.3M -$86.1M PDPagerDuty3.04x -- $121.4M -$8.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns QBTS or PLUS?
ePlus has a net margin of -3727.89% compared to D-Wave Quantum's net margin of 4.72%. D-Wave Quantum's return on equity of -- beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBTSD-Wave Quantum63.79% -$0.37 $93.1M PLUSePlus27.57% $0.91 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About QBTS or PLUS?
D-Wave Quantum has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.18%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.23%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than D-Wave Quantum, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than D-Wave Quantum.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBTSD-Wave Quantum3 0 0 PLUSePlus1 0 0 -
Is QBTS or PLUS More Risky?
D-Wave Quantum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.524%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QBTS or PLUS?
D-Wave Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. D-Wave Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QBTS or PLUS?
D-Wave Quantum quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. D-Wave Quantum's net income of -$86.1M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, D-Wave Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for D-Wave Quantum is 157.77x versus 0.73x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBTSD-Wave Quantum157.77x -- $2.3M -$86.1M PLUSePlus0.73x 14.85x $511M $24.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Chewy a Growth Stock to Buy?
It might be a surprise to learn that during the…
Is Realty Income the Best Dividend Stock to Buy Long-Term?
Realty Income (NYSE:O) is a longstanding real estate investment trust…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
