PAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of -20.5% compared to PAR Technology's net margin of -1.67%. PAR Technology's return on equity of -0.52% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89%.

PAR Technology has a consensus price target of $89.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.09%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $375.18 which suggests that it could grow by 3.56%. Given that PAR Technology has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe PAR Technology is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

PAR Technology has a beta of 2.196, which suggesting that the stock is 119.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.217%.

PAR Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PAR Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PAR Technology quarterly revenues are $96.8M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. PAR Technology's net income of -$19.8M is lower than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M. Notably, PAR Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 710.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PAR Technology is 4.95x versus 24.09x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MicroStrategy has a net margin of -20.5% compared to PAR Technology's net margin of -293.07%. PAR Technology's return on equity of -0.52% beat MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93%.

PAR Technology has a consensus price target of $89.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.09%. On the other hand MicroStrategy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.42%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than PAR Technology, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than PAR Technology.

PAR Technology has a beta of 2.196, which suggesting that the stock is 119.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.477%.

PAR Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MicroStrategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PAR Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroStrategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PAR Technology quarterly revenues are $96.8M, which are smaller than MicroStrategy quarterly revenues of $116.1M. PAR Technology's net income of -$19.8M is higher than MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M. Notably, PAR Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MicroStrategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PAR Technology is 4.95x versus 151.04x for MicroStrategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -20.5% compared to PAR Technology's net margin of 8.94%. PAR Technology's return on equity of -0.52% beat Workday's return on equity of 20.33%.

PAR Technology has a consensus price target of $89.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.09%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $292.30 which suggests that it could grow by 7.05%. Given that PAR Technology has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe PAR Technology is more attractive than Workday.

PAR Technology has a beta of 2.196, which suggesting that the stock is 119.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.338%.

PAR Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PAR Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PAR Technology quarterly revenues are $96.8M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. PAR Technology's net income of -$19.8M is lower than Workday's net income of $193M. Notably, PAR Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 45.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PAR Technology is 4.95x versus 9.00x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zoom Communications has a net margin of -20.5% compared to PAR Technology's net margin of 17.58%. PAR Technology's return on equity of -0.52% beat Zoom Communications's return on equity of 11.5%.

PAR Technology has a consensus price target of $89.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.09%. On the other hand Zoom Communications has an analysts' consensus of $91.60 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that PAR Technology has higher upside potential than Zoom Communications, analysts believe PAR Technology is more attractive than Zoom Communications.

PAR Technology has a beta of 2.196, which suggesting that the stock is 119.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zoom Communications has a beta of -0.029, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.897%.

PAR Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zoom Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PAR Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zoom Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PAR Technology quarterly revenues are $96.8M, which are smaller than Zoom Communications quarterly revenues of $1.2B. PAR Technology's net income of -$19.8M is lower than Zoom Communications's net income of $207.1M. Notably, PAR Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zoom Communications's PE ratio is 28.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PAR Technology is 4.95x versus 5.81x for Zoom Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.