NVGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cool has a net margin of 14.99% compared to Navigator Holdings's net margin of 10.38%. Navigator Holdings's return on equity of 6.9% beat Cool's return on equity of 11.39%.

Navigator Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.17, signalling upside risk potential of 77.33%. On the other hand Cool has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 154.72%. Given that Cool has higher upside potential than Navigator Holdings, analysts believe Cool is more attractive than Navigator Holdings.

Navigator Holdings has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.362% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cool has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Navigator Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Cool offers a yield of 26.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Navigator Holdings pays 16.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Cool pays out 75.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navigator Holdings quarterly revenues are $144M, which are larger than Cool quarterly revenues of $78.5M. Navigator Holdings's net income of $21.6M is higher than Cool's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Navigator Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.42x while Cool's PE ratio is 2.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Holdings is 1.58x versus 0.88x for Cool. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scorpio Tankers has a net margin of 14.99% compared to Navigator Holdings's net margin of 33.61%. Navigator Holdings's return on equity of 6.9% beat Scorpio Tankers's return on equity of 23.98%.

Navigator Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.17, signalling upside risk potential of 77.33%. On the other hand Scorpio Tankers has an analysts' consensus of $65.20 which suggests that it could grow by 82.68%. Given that Scorpio Tankers has higher upside potential than Navigator Holdings, analysts believe Scorpio Tankers is more attractive than Navigator Holdings.

Navigator Holdings has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.362% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scorpio Tankers has a beta of -0.007, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.747%.

Navigator Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Scorpio Tankers offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Navigator Holdings pays 16.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Scorpio Tankers pays out 12.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navigator Holdings quarterly revenues are $144M, which are smaller than Scorpio Tankers quarterly revenues of $204M. Navigator Holdings's net income of $21.6M is lower than Scorpio Tankers's net income of $68.6M. Notably, Navigator Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.42x while Scorpio Tankers's PE ratio is 2.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Holdings is 1.58x versus 1.46x for Scorpio Tankers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a net margin of 14.99% compared to Navigator Holdings's net margin of 13.26%. Navigator Holdings's return on equity of 6.9% beat Tsakos Energy Navigation's return on equity of 11.15%.

Navigator Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.17, signalling upside risk potential of 77.33%. On the other hand Tsakos Energy Navigation has an analysts' consensus of $29.67 which suggests that it could grow by 85.88%. Given that Tsakos Energy Navigation has higher upside potential than Navigator Holdings, analysts believe Tsakos Energy Navigation is more attractive than Navigator Holdings.

Navigator Holdings has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.362% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tsakos Energy Navigation has a beta of -0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.888%.

Navigator Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Tsakos Energy Navigation offers a yield of 9.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Navigator Holdings pays 16.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsakos Energy Navigation pays out 20.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navigator Holdings quarterly revenues are $144M, which are smaller than Tsakos Energy Navigation quarterly revenues of $200.2M. Navigator Holdings's net income of $21.6M is lower than Tsakos Energy Navigation's net income of $26.5M. Notably, Navigator Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.42x while Tsakos Energy Navigation's PE ratio is 3.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Holdings is 1.58x versus 0.56x for Tsakos Energy Navigation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TORM PLC has a net margin of 14.99% compared to Navigator Holdings's net margin of 25.44%. Navigator Holdings's return on equity of 6.9% beat TORM PLC's return on equity of 30.92%.

Navigator Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.17, signalling upside risk potential of 77.33%. On the other hand TORM PLC has an analysts' consensus of $25.50 which suggests that it could grow by 60.78%. Given that Navigator Holdings has higher upside potential than TORM PLC, analysts believe Navigator Holdings is more attractive than TORM PLC.

Navigator Holdings has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.362% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TORM PLC has a beta of 0.182, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.775%.

Navigator Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. TORM PLC offers a yield of 40.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Navigator Holdings pays 16.66% of its earnings as a dividend. TORM PLC pays out 90.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navigator Holdings quarterly revenues are $144M, which are smaller than TORM PLC quarterly revenues of $305.4M. Navigator Holdings's net income of $21.6M is lower than TORM PLC's net income of $77.7M. Notably, Navigator Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.42x while TORM PLC's PE ratio is 2.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navigator Holdings is 1.58x versus 0.98x for TORM PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.