ML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 1.09% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 20.17%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 3.32% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of $94.25, signalling upside risk potential of 8.63%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.41 which suggests that it could grow by 2.85%. Given that MoneyLion has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe MoneyLion is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.473%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $158.6M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. MoneyLion's net income of $1.7M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.68x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.87x versus 6.57x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 1.09% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 18.49%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 3.32% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of $94.25, signalling upside risk potential of 8.63%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $335.29 which suggests that it could grow by 28.15%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than MoneyLion, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than MoneyLion.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.556%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $158.6M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. MoneyLion's net income of $1.7M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.68x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 51.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.87x versus 9.26x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gen Digital has a net margin of 1.09% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 16.13%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 3.32% beat Gen Digital's return on equity of 29.58%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of $94.25, signalling upside risk potential of 8.63%. On the other hand Gen Digital has an analysts' consensus of $30.99 which suggests that it could grow by 17.24%. Given that Gen Digital has higher upside potential than MoneyLion, analysts believe Gen Digital is more attractive than MoneyLion.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gen Digital has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.59%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gen Digital offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gen Digital pays out 52.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Gen Digital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $158.6M, which are smaller than Gen Digital quarterly revenues of $986M. MoneyLion's net income of $1.7M is lower than Gen Digital's net income of $159M. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.68x while Gen Digital's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.87x versus 4.25x for Gen Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 1.09% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 0.54%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 3.32% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of $94.25, signalling upside risk potential of 8.63%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 269.88%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than MoneyLion, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than MoneyLion.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.144%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $158.6M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. MoneyLion's net income of $1.7M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 115.68x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.87x versus 0.63x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.