MEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DLH Holdings has a net margin of -5.91% compared to Montrose Environmental Group's net margin of 2.38%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of -9.56% beat DLH Holdings's return on equity of 6.94%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a consensus price target of $35.83, signalling upside risk potential of 107.73%. On the other hand DLH Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 95.31%. Given that Montrose Environmental Group has higher upside potential than DLH Holdings, analysts believe Montrose Environmental Group is more attractive than DLH Holdings.

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DLH Holdings has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.477%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DLH Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montrose Environmental Group pays -53.15% of its earnings as a dividend. DLH Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montrose Environmental Group quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are larger than DLH Holdings quarterly revenues of $96.4M. Montrose Environmental Group's net income of -$10.6M is lower than DLH Holdings's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Montrose Environmental Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DLH Holdings's PE ratio is 15.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montrose Environmental Group is 0.82x versus 0.28x for DLH Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FTI Consulting has a net margin of -5.91% compared to Montrose Environmental Group's net margin of 7.18%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of -9.56% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a consensus price target of $35.83, signalling upside risk potential of 107.73%. On the other hand FTI Consulting has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.46%. Given that Montrose Environmental Group has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Montrose Environmental Group is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.125, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.548%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FTI Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montrose Environmental Group pays -53.15% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montrose Environmental Group quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are smaller than FTI Consulting quarterly revenues of $926M. Montrose Environmental Group's net income of -$10.6M is lower than FTI Consulting's net income of $66.5M. Notably, Montrose Environmental Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FTI Consulting's PE ratio is 22.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montrose Environmental Group is 0.82x versus 1.87x for FTI Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of -5.91% compared to Montrose Environmental Group's net margin of 7.18%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of -9.56% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 16.4%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a consensus price target of $35.83, signalling upside risk potential of 107.73%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.07%. Given that Montrose Environmental Group has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe Montrose Environmental Group is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.553%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montrose Environmental Group pays -53.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montrose Environmental Group quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are smaller than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $378.1M. Montrose Environmental Group's net income of -$10.6M is lower than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Montrose Environmental Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 26.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montrose Environmental Group is 0.82x versus 1.57x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of -5.91% compared to Montrose Environmental Group's net margin of 6.32%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of -9.56% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.6%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a consensus price target of $35.83, signalling upside risk potential of 107.73%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.5%. Given that Montrose Environmental Group has higher upside potential than ICF International, analysts believe Montrose Environmental Group is more attractive than ICF International.

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.825%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Montrose Environmental Group pays -53.15% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Montrose Environmental Group quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are smaller than ICF International quarterly revenues of $517M. Montrose Environmental Group's net income of -$10.6M is lower than ICF International's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Montrose Environmental Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ICF International's PE ratio is 20.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montrose Environmental Group is 0.82x versus 1.11x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.