KW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Concept Energy has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -10.81%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.83%.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than New Concept Energy.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.330, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.016%.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $37K. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than New Concept Energy's net income of -$4K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.57x versus 40.50x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -15.14%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -36.77%.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.207, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.252%.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out 88.35% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$276.4K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 43.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.57x versus 2.53x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power REIT has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -22.79%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat Power REIT's return on equity of -104.5%.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand Power REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3208.27%. Given that Power REIT has higher upside potential than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, analysts believe Power REIT is more attractive than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power REIT has a beta of 1.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.793%.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. Power REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Power REIT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than Power REIT quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than Power REIT's net income of -$325K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Power REIT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.57x versus 1.43x for Power REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RE/MAX Holdings has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of 1.23%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat RE/MAX Holdings's return on equity of --.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand RE/MAX Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.13 which suggests that it could fall by -8.62%. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than RE/MAX Holdings, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than RE/MAX Holdings.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RE/MAX Holdings has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.862%.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. RE/MAX Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. RE/MAX Holdings pays out -19.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than RE/MAX Holdings quarterly revenues of $78.5M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than RE/MAX Holdings's net income of $966K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RE/MAX Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.57x versus 0.64x for RE/MAX Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.