KVYO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enfusion has a net margin of -9.98% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of 0.23%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.73% beat Enfusion's return on equity of 3.17%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $51.38, signalling upside risk potential of 65.75%. On the other hand Enfusion has an analysts' consensus of $10.93 which suggests that it could fall by -1.64%. Given that Klaviyo has higher upside potential than Enfusion, analysts believe Klaviyo is more attractive than Enfusion.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enfusion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enfusion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Enfusion quarterly revenues of $52.9M. Klaviyo's net income of -$27M is lower than Enfusion's net income of $121K. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enfusion's PE ratio is 370.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 8.81x versus 6.59x for Enfusion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks has a net margin of -9.98% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of -11.26%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.73% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -8.61%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $51.38, signalling upside risk potential of 65.75%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $21.41 which suggests that it could grow by 49.42%. Given that Klaviyo has higher upside potential than Freshworks, analysts believe Klaviyo is more attractive than Freshworks.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are larger than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $194.6M. Klaviyo's net income of -$27M is lower than Freshworks's net income of -$21.9M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 8.81x versus 5.98x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Samsara has a net margin of -9.98% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of -3.24%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.73% beat Samsara's return on equity of -15.9%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $51.38, signalling upside risk potential of 65.75%. On the other hand Samsara has an analysts' consensus of $48.90 which suggests that it could grow by 26.02%. Given that Klaviyo has higher upside potential than Samsara, analysts believe Klaviyo is more attractive than Samsara.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samsara has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samsara offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samsara pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Samsara quarterly revenues of $346.3M. Klaviyo's net income of -$27M is lower than Samsara's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Samsara's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 8.81x versus 17.28x for Samsara. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -9.98% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of 9.55%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.73% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $51.38, signalling upside risk potential of 65.75%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $86.61 which suggests that it could grow by 2.28%. Given that Klaviyo has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Klaviyo is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $270.2M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. Klaviyo's net income of -$27M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 445.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 8.81x versus 72.42x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.