HG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conduit Holdings has a net margin of 5.82% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of --. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67% beat Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $23.83, signalling upside risk potential of 23.87%. On the other hand Conduit Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conduit Holdings offers a yield of 5.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings pays out 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $583M, which are larger than Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M is higher than Conduit Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.29x while Conduit Holdings's PE ratio is 7.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.88x versus 1.32x for Conduit Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everest Group has a net margin of 5.82% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of -12.85%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 9.78%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $23.83, signalling upside risk potential of 23.87%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $404.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.02%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Everest Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $583M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M is higher than Everest Group's net income of -$593M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.29x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.88x versus 0.84x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 5.82% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of 45.61%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 9.77%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $23.83, signalling upside risk potential of 23.87%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.92%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.851%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $583M, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $342M. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $156M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.29x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 9.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.88x versus 4.13x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 5.82% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group's net margin of -570.56%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $23.83, signalling upside risk potential of 23.87%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 153.04%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.628%.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hamilton Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $583M, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M. Notably, Hamilton Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.29x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Insurance Group is 0.88x versus 0.90x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.