GSBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 89.14% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 27.77%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.94% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 26.85%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $12.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.11%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs BDC has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 1.050, which suggesting that the stock is 5.003% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.034%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.61%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Goldman Sachs BDC pays 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Goldman Sachs BDC's is not.

Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $37.5M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $7.4M. Notably, Goldman Sachs BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.61x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs BDC is 17.95x versus 2.65x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 89.14% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 29.64%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.94% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 11.93%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $12.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.11%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $637.60 which suggests that it could grow by 11.1%. Given that The Goldman Sachs Group has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs BDC, analysts believe The Goldman Sachs Group is more attractive than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 1.050, which suggesting that the stock is 5.003% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.045%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.61%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Goldman Sachs BDC pays 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 31.5% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Goldman Sachs BDC's is not.

Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $13.9B. Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $37.5M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $4.1B. Notably, Goldman Sachs BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.61x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 14.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs BDC is 17.95x versus 3.58x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 89.14% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 90.38%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.94% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $12.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.11%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could grow by 10.2%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 1.050, which suggesting that the stock is 5.003% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.391%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.61%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Goldman Sachs BDC pays 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $37.5M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Goldman Sachs BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.61x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs BDC is 17.95x versus 9.28x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 89.14% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of -121.48%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.94% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $12.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.11%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 0.87%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs BDC, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 1.050, which suggesting that the stock is 5.003% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.562%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.61%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 12.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Goldman Sachs BDC pays 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $37.5M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Goldman Sachs BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.61x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 23.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs BDC is 17.95x versus 26.32x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.