GRND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 27.63% compared to Grindr's net margin of 17.52%. Grindr's return on equity of -- beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

Grindr has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.32%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $327.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.9%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Grindr, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Grindr.

Grindr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.152%.

Grindr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grindr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grindr quarterly revenues are $89.3M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Grindr's net income of $24.7M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, Grindr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 59.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindr is 10.05x versus 10.92x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bumble has a net margin of 27.63% compared to Grindr's net margin of -224.12%. Grindr's return on equity of -- beat Bumble's return on equity of -27.32%.

Grindr has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.32%. On the other hand Bumble has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 0.8%. Given that Grindr has higher upside potential than Bumble, analysts believe Grindr is more attractive than Bumble.

Grindr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bumble has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grindr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bumble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grindr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bumble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grindr quarterly revenues are $89.3M, which are smaller than Bumble quarterly revenues of $273.6M. Grindr's net income of $24.7M is higher than Bumble's net income of -$613.2M. Notably, Grindr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bumble's PE ratio is 19.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindr is 10.05x versus 0.95x for Bumble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 27.63% compared to Grindr's net margin of -9.14%. Grindr's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Grindr has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.32%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 118.39%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Grindr, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Grindr.

Grindr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

Grindr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grindr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grindr quarterly revenues are $89.3M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Grindr's net income of $24.7M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Grindr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindr is 10.05x versus 0.77x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of 27.63% compared to Grindr's net margin of -6.7%. Grindr's return on equity of -- beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Grindr has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.32%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.89%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Grindr, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Grindr.

Grindr has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Grindr has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grindr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grindr quarterly revenues are $89.3M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Grindr's net income of $24.7M is higher than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Grindr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindr is 10.05x versus 1.16x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.