Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
81
FOUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$103.76
Seasonality move
:
16.2%
Day range:
$100.00 - $104.89
52-week range:
$55.87 - $116.84
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
56.26x
P/S ratio:
2.39x
P/B ratio:
8.96x
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
2.6M
1-year change:
39.89%
Market cap:
$7.3B
Revenue:
$2.6B
EPS (TTM):
$1.84
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOUR
Shift4 Payments
|
$973.5M | $1.06 | 41.01% | 435.49% | $117.81 |
|
MSFT
Microsoft
|
$64.6B | $3.11 | 11.05% | 7.23% | $507.50 |
|
NATL
NCR Atleos
|
$1.1B | $0.79 | 0.32% | -9.42% | -- |
|
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings
|
$222.2M | $0.05 | 14.38% | -53.33% | -- |
|
RPAY
Repay Holdings
|
$79.1M | $0.23 | 8.45% | -- | $11.41 |
|
SQ
Block
|
$6.3B | $0.89 | 8.23% | 406.18% | $97.06 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOUR
Shift4 Payments
|
$103.52 | $117.81 | $7.3B | 56.26x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.39x |
|
MSFT
Microsoft
|
$436.60 | $507.50 | $3.2T | 36.02x | $0.83 | 0.71% | 12.83x |
|
NATL
NCR Atleos
|
$32.23 | -- | $2.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.54x |
|
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings
|
$8.58 | -- | $662.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.79x |
|
RPAY
Repay Holdings
|
$7.78 | $11.41 | $672.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.36x |
|
SQ
Block
|
$89.65 | $97.06 | $55.6B | 53.68x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.39x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOUR
Shift4 Payments
|
77.76% | 3.077 | 44.96% | 2.48x |
|
MSFT
Microsoft
|
13.56% | 1.376 | 1.41% | 1.06x |
|
NATL
NCR Atleos
|
91.9% | 2.132 | 145.09% | 0.57x |
|
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings
|
108.04% | 5.037 | 128.87% | 0.12x |
|
RPAY
Repay Holdings
|
39.67% | 1.812 | 67.9% | 2.52x |
|
SQ
Block
|
26.19% | 2.703 | 17.09% | 1.82x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOUR
Shift4 Payments
|
$267.3M | $81.9M | 4.5% | 14.76% | -20.9% | $131.4M |
|
MSFT
Microsoft
|
$45.5B | $30.6B | 28.71% | 35.68% | 47.04% | $19.3B |
|
NATL
NCR Atleos
|
$262M | $124M | -3.14% | -12.83% | 10.76% | $69M |
|
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings
|
$86M | $38.1M | 2.14% | 36.63% | 16.41% | $14.5M |
|
RPAY
Repay Holdings
|
$61.6M | -$675K | -6.2% | -9.53% | -0.85% | $48.8M |
|
SQ
Block
|
$2.2B | $515.1M | 4.23% | 5.56% | 8.62% | $628.2M |
Shift4 Payments vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FOUR or MSFT?
Microsoft has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 37.61%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOURShift4 Payments29.4% $0.74 $3.9B MSFTMicrosoft69.35% $3.30 $332.8B -
What do Analysts Say About FOUR or MSFT?
Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 13.8%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.24%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Shift4 Payments.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOURShift4 Payments13 5 0 MSFTMicrosoft37 5 0 -
Is FOUR or MSFT More Risky?
Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOUR or MSFT?
Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOUR or MSFT?
Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.26x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.39x versus 12.83x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOURShift4 Payments2.39x 56.26x $909.2M $53.8M MSFTMicrosoft12.83x 36.02x $65.6B $24.7B
-
Which has Higher Returns FOUR or NATL?
NCR Atleos has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 2.23%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat NCR Atleos's return on equity of -12.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOURShift4 Payments29.4% $0.74 $3.9B NATLNCR Atleos24.3% $0.32 $3.3B -
What do Analysts Say About FOUR or NATL?
Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 13.8%. On the other hand NCR Atleos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.58%. Given that NCR Atleos has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, analysts believe NCR Atleos is more attractive than Shift4 Payments.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOURShift4 Payments13 5 0 NATLNCR Atleos0 0 0 -
Is FOUR or NATL More Risky?
Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Atleos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOUR or NATL?
Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Atleos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Atleos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOUR or NATL?
Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are smaller than NCR Atleos quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is higher than NCR Atleos's net income of $24M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.26x while NCR Atleos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.39x versus 0.54x for NCR Atleos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOURShift4 Payments2.39x 56.26x $909.2M $53.8M NATLNCR Atleos0.54x -- $1.1B $24M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOUR or PRTH?
Priority Technology Holdings has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 4.67%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOURShift4 Payments29.4% $0.74 $3.9B PRTHPriority Technology Holdings37.87% $0.07 $757.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FOUR or PRTH?
Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 13.8%. On the other hand Priority Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 57.34%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings is more attractive than Shift4 Payments.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOURShift4 Payments13 5 0 PRTHPriority Technology Holdings0 0 0 -
Is FOUR or PRTH More Risky?
Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.668%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOUR or PRTH?
Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Priority Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Priority Technology Holdings pays out -1885.43% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOUR or PRTH?
Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are larger than Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of $227M. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is higher than Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.26x while Priority Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.39x versus 0.79x for Priority Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOURShift4 Payments2.39x 56.26x $909.2M $53.8M PRTHPriority Technology Holdings0.79x -- $227M $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOUR or RPAY?
Repay Holdings has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 4.1%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat Repay Holdings's return on equity of -9.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOURShift4 Payments29.4% $0.74 $3.9B RPAYRepay Holdings77.78% $0.03 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About FOUR or RPAY?
Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 13.8%. On the other hand Repay Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.41 which suggests that it could grow by 46.65%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than Shift4 Payments.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOURShift4 Payments13 5 0 RPAYRepay Holdings5 5 0 -
Is FOUR or RPAY More Risky?
Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.492%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOUR or RPAY?
Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Repay Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Repay Holdings pays out -3.19% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOUR or RPAY?
Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are larger than Repay Holdings quarterly revenues of $79.1M. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is higher than Repay Holdings's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.26x while Repay Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.39x versus 2.36x for Repay Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOURShift4 Payments2.39x 56.26x $909.2M $53.8M RPAYRepay Holdings2.36x -- $79.1M $3.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOUR or SQ?
Block has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 4.75%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat Block's return on equity of 5.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOURShift4 Payments29.4% $0.74 $3.9B SQBlock37.65% $0.45 $27B -
What do Analysts Say About FOUR or SQ?
Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 13.8%. On the other hand Block has an analysts' consensus of $97.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.26%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Block, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Block.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOURShift4 Payments13 5 0 SQBlock29 11 3 -
Is FOUR or SQ More Risky?
Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Block has a beta of 2.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.791%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOUR or SQ?
Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Block offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Block pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOUR or SQ?
Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are smaller than Block quarterly revenues of $6B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is lower than Block's net income of $283.8M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.26x while Block's PE ratio is 53.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.39x versus 2.39x for Block. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOURShift4 Payments2.39x 56.26x $909.2M $53.8M SQBlock2.39x 53.68x $6B $283.8M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 0.73% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 6.55% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 5.65% over the past day.
