FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gen Digital has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 16.13%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Gen Digital's return on equity of 29.58%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,046.56, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Gen Digital has an analysts' consensus of $30.99 which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that Gen Digital has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Gen Digital is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, which suggesting that the stock is 41.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gen Digital has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.59%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gen Digital offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gen Digital pays out 52.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Gen Digital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than Gen Digital quarterly revenues of $986M. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is lower than Gen Digital's net income of $159M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 85.05x while Gen Digital's PE ratio is 26.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 26.08x versus 4.37x for Gen Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 11.89%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.84%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,046.56, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $705.62 which suggests that it could grow by 16.82%. Given that Intuit has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Intuit is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, which suggesting that the stock is 41.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.049%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $4B. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is lower than Intuit's net income of $471M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 85.05x while Intuit's PE ratio is 56.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 26.08x versus 9.98x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paychex has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 31.39%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Paychex's return on equity of 45.61%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,046.56, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Paychex has an analysts' consensus of $139.87 which suggests that it could fall by -2.2%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Paychex, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Paychex.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, which suggesting that the stock is 41.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paychex has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.439%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paychex offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex pays out 77.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than Paychex quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is lower than Paychex's net income of $413.4M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 85.05x while Paychex's PE ratio is 30.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 26.08x versus 9.64x for Paychex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 14.55%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat PTC's return on equity of 12.89%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,046.56, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand PTC has an analysts' consensus of $209.32 which suggests that it could grow by 30.96%. Given that PTC has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe PTC is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, which suggesting that the stock is 41.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.841%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than PTC quarterly revenues of $565.1M. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is higher than PTC's net income of $82.2M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 85.05x while PTC's PE ratio is 49.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 26.08x versus 8.36x for PTC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.