FHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

US Global Investors has a net margin of 19.95% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of -3.86%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.5% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 1.04%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling downside risk potential of -1.57%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.802, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.201%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $424.7M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Federated Hermes's net income of $84.7M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$86K. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 84.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.02x versus 3.40x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 19.95% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 19.05%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.5% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 13.73%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling downside risk potential of -1.57%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $87.62 which suggests that it could grow by 2.35%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.377%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $424.7M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Federated Hermes's net income of $84.7M is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of $905.4M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.02x versus 1.24x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 19.95% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 27.96%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.5% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 25.84%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling downside risk potential of -1.57%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.28%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.843%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $424.7M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $557.2M. Federated Hermes's net income of $84.7M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $155.8M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 17.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.02x versus 4.85x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 19.95% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 24.11%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.5% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.29%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling downside risk potential of -1.57%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $110.54 which suggests that it could grow by 17.05%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.464%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $424.7M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Federated Hermes's net income of $84.7M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $439.9M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.02x versus 2.97x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.