ET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Excelerate Energy has a net margin of 5.7% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 4.63%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 11.37% beat Excelerate Energy's return on equity of 1.4%.

Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12.73%. On the other hand Excelerate Energy has an analysts' consensus of $28.70 which suggests that it could fall by -3.59%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Excelerate Energy, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Excelerate Energy.

Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelerate Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Excelerate Energy offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 107.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy pays out 61.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $20.8B, which are larger than Excelerate Energy quarterly revenues of $193.4M. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is higher than Excelerate Energy's net income of $9M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Excelerate Energy's PE ratio is 30.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus 1.69x for Excelerate Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enterprise Products Partners LP has a net margin of 5.7% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 10.29%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 11.37% beat Enterprise Products Partners LP's return on equity of 20.39%.

Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12.73%. On the other hand Enterprise Products Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $34.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.78%. Given that Enterprise Products Partners LP has higher upside potential than Energy Transfer LP, analysts believe Enterprise Products Partners LP is more attractive than Energy Transfer LP.

Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enterprise Products Partners LP has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.931%.

Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Enterprise Products Partners LP offers a yield of 6.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 107.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Enterprise Products Partners LP pays out 77.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Enterprise Products Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $20.8B, which are larger than Enterprise Products Partners LP quarterly revenues of $13.8B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is lower than Enterprise Products Partners LP's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Enterprise Products Partners LP's PE ratio is 11.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus 1.20x for Enterprise Products Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 5.7% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 23.73%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 11.37% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 42.31%.

Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12.73%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $229.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.63%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Cheniere Energy.

Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.517%.

Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 107.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $20.8B, which are larger than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is higher than Cheniere Energy's net income of $893M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 13.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus 3.02x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams Companies has a net margin of 5.7% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 26.61%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 11.37% beat Williams Companies's return on equity of 19.5%.

Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12.73%. On the other hand Williams Companies has an analysts' consensus of $55.58 which suggests that it could grow by 3.92%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams Companies has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.851%.

Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Williams Companies offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 107.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies pays out 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $20.8B, which are larger than Williams Companies quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is higher than Williams Companies's net income of $706M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Williams Companies's PE ratio is 22.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus 6.20x for Williams Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.