ENS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of 12.67% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -11.21%. EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $115.15, signalling upside risk potential of 19.62%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 132.2%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.375%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $906.2M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $16.8M. EnerSys's net income of $114.8M is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.10x versus 0.53x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta has a net margin of 12.67% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -90.63%. EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25% beat NeoVolta's return on equity of -72.02%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $115.15, signalling upside risk potential of 19.62%. On the other hand NeoVolta has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 185.17%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. NeoVolta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $906.2M, which are larger than NeoVolta quarterly revenues of $1.1M. EnerSys's net income of $114.8M is higher than NeoVolta's net income of -$971.1K. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while NeoVolta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.10x versus 34.64x for NeoVolta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 12.67% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 14.68%. EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.35%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $115.15, signalling upside risk potential of 19.62%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $390.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.18%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than RBC Bearings.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.719, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.858%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $906.2M, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $394.4M. EnerSys's net income of $114.8M is higher than RBC Bearings's net income of $57.9M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 45.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.10x versus 6.10x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 12.67% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 2.82%. EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.09%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $115.15, signalling upside risk potential of 19.62%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $178.82 which suggests that it could grow by 48.1%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.378%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $906.2M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. EnerSys's net income of $114.8M is higher than Regal Rexnord's net income of $41.2M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 40.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.10x versus 1.33x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.