ELF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coty has a net margin of 6.32% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 4.96%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 16.85% beat Coty's return on equity of 3.85%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $158.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand Coty has an analysts' consensus of $10.16 which suggests that it could grow by 43.73%. Given that Coty has higher upside potential than e.l.f. Beauty, analysts believe Coty is more attractive than e.l.f. Beauty.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coty has a beta of 1.889, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.86%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coty pays out 14.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Coty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $301.1M, which are smaller than Coty quarterly revenues of $1.7B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $19M is lower than Coty's net income of $82.9M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.70x while Coty's PE ratio is 40.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 6.18x versus 1.02x for Coty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goldenwell Biotech has a net margin of 6.32% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of -35913.67%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 16.85% beat Goldenwell Biotech's return on equity of -176.34%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $158.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand Goldenwell Biotech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Goldenwell Biotech, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Goldenwell Biotech.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldenwell Biotech has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goldenwell Biotech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldenwell Biotech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $301.1M, which are larger than Goldenwell Biotech quarterly revenues of $140. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $19M is higher than Goldenwell Biotech's net income of -$23.1K. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.70x while Goldenwell Biotech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 6.18x versus 20,539.58x for Goldenwell Biotech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Honest has a net margin of 6.32% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 0.17%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 16.85% beat The Honest's return on equity of -3.3%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $158.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand The Honest has an analysts' consensus of $7.14 which suggests that it could grow by 6.93%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than The Honest, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than The Honest.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Honest has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Honest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Honest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $301.1M, which are larger than The Honest quarterly revenues of $99.2M. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $19M is higher than The Honest's net income of $165K. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.70x while The Honest's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 6.18x versus 1.79x for The Honest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingles Markets has a net margin of 6.32% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 2.28%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 16.85% beat Ingles Markets's return on equity of 10.73%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $158.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand Ingles Markets has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Ingles Markets, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Ingles Markets.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingles Markets has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.424%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingles Markets offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingles Markets pays out 5.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingles Markets's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $301.1M, which are smaller than Ingles Markets quarterly revenues of $1.4B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $19M is lower than Ingles Markets's net income of $31.7M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.70x while Ingles Markets's PE ratio is 7.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 6.18x versus 0.21x for Ingles Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.