CW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heico has a net margin of 14.3% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 16.3%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.66%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $382.82, signalling upside risk potential of 21.77%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of $208.25 which suggests that it could grow by 4.32%. Given that Curtiss-Wright has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe Curtiss-Wright is more attractive than Heico.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.865%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Heico offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $824.3M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1B. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M is lower than Heico's net income of $168M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.01x while Heico's PE ratio is 49.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 3.89x versus 7.02x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 14.3% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 7.19%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.44%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $382.82, signalling upside risk potential of 21.77%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that Curtiss-Wright has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe Curtiss-Wright is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.219, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.078%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $824.3M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $145.8M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $10.5M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.01x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 22.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 3.89x versus 1.26x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VSE has a net margin of 14.3% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 4.37%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73% beat VSE's return on equity of 2.02%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $382.82, signalling upside risk potential of 21.77%. On the other hand VSE has an analysts' consensus of $138.43 which suggests that it could grow by 23.12%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VSE has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.366%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. VSE offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. VSE pays out 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $824.3M, which are larger than VSE quarterly revenues of $299M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M is higher than VSE's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.01x while VSE's PE ratio is 139.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 3.89x versus 1.87x for VSE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of 14.3% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 2.16%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73% beat V2X's return on equity of 3.47%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $382.82, signalling upside risk potential of 21.77%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $66.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.69%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.447, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.292%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $824.3M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M is higher than V2X's net income of $25M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.01x while V2X's PE ratio is 46.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 3.89x versus 0.37x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.