CRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of -9.49% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 9.43%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $11.54, signalling downside risk potential of -27.04%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.25%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.572, which suggesting that the stock is 42.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.231%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Comstock Resources pays 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M is lower than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 34.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 3.46x versus 1.84x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gulfport Energy has a net margin of -9.49% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of -6.47%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66% beat Gulfport Energy's return on equity of 12.01%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $11.54, signalling downside risk potential of -27.04%. On the other hand Gulfport Energy has an analysts' consensus of $189.71 which suggests that it could grow by 15.46%. Given that Gulfport Energy has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe Gulfport Energy is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.572, which suggesting that the stock is 42.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gulfport Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Resources pays 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulfport Energy pays out 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are larger than Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues of $215.9M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M is lower than Gulfport Energy's net income of -$14M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Gulfport Energy's PE ratio is 14.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 3.46x versus 3.36x for Gulfport Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of -9.49% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 8.92%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 12.83%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $11.54, signalling downside risk potential of -27.04%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $35.35 which suggests that it could grow by 6.53%. Given that Range Resources has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe Range Resources is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.572, which suggesting that the stock is 42.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.101%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Comstock Resources pays 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 8.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are smaller than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $567.9M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M is lower than Range Resources's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 16.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 3.46x versus 3.42x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of -9.49% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 37.44%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $11.54, signalling downside risk potential of -27.04%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $56.36 which suggests that it could grow by 45.4%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.572, which suggesting that the stock is 42.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.189%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SM Energy offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Comstock Resources pays 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $642.4M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $240.5M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 5.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 3.46x versus 1.74x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.