CIVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crescent Energy has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Civitas Resources's net margin of -13.49%. Civitas Resources's return on equity of 12.83% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity of -2.97%.

Civitas Resources has a consensus price target of $49.40, signalling upside risk potential of 76.56%. On the other hand Crescent Energy has an analysts' consensus of $14.74 which suggests that it could grow by 81.29%. Given that Crescent Energy has higher upside potential than Civitas Resources, analysts believe Crescent Energy is more attractive than Civitas Resources.

Civitas Resources has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Civitas Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.37%. Crescent Energy offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Civitas Resources pays 58.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Civitas Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Civitas Resources quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Crescent Energy quarterly revenues of $875.3M. Civitas Resources's net income of $151.1M is higher than Crescent Energy's net income of -$118M. Notably, Civitas Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.30x while Crescent Energy's PE ratio is 16.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Civitas Resources is 0.53x versus 0.56x for Crescent Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Civitas Resources's net margin of 29.06%. Civitas Resources's return on equity of 12.83% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

Civitas Resources has a consensus price target of $49.40, signalling upside risk potential of 76.56%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $193.64 which suggests that it could grow by 48.7%. Given that Civitas Resources has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Civitas Resources is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Civitas Resources has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.265%.

Civitas Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.37%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Civitas Resources pays 58.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Civitas Resources quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Civitas Resources's net income of $151.1M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Civitas Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.30x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Civitas Resources is 0.53x versus 2.52x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ovintiv has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Civitas Resources's net margin of -2.74%. Civitas Resources's return on equity of 12.83% beat Ovintiv's return on equity of 10.83%.

Civitas Resources has a consensus price target of $49.40, signalling upside risk potential of 76.56%. On the other hand Ovintiv has an analysts' consensus of $52.57 which suggests that it could grow by 58.83%. Given that Civitas Resources has higher upside potential than Ovintiv, analysts believe Civitas Resources is more attractive than Ovintiv.

Civitas Resources has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ovintiv has a beta of 2.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.474%.

Civitas Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.37%. Ovintiv offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Civitas Resources pays 58.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Ovintiv pays out 28.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Civitas Resources quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Ovintiv quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Civitas Resources's net income of $151.1M is higher than Ovintiv's net income of -$60M. Notably, Civitas Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.30x while Ovintiv's PE ratio is 7.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Civitas Resources is 0.53x versus 0.97x for Ovintiv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of 11.7% compared to Civitas Resources's net margin of -67.26%. Civitas Resources's return on equity of 12.83% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of -6.12%.

Civitas Resources has a consensus price target of $49.40, signalling upside risk potential of 76.56%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $26.73 which suggests that it could grow by 87.3%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Civitas Resources, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Civitas Resources.

Civitas Resources has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 2.823, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.26%.

Civitas Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.37%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Civitas Resources pays 58.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Civitas Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Civitas Resources quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $534.4M. Civitas Resources's net income of $151.1M is higher than Vital Energy's net income of -$359.4M. Notably, Civitas Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.30x while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Civitas Resources is 0.53x versus 0.27x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.