BSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hess Midstream LP has a net margin of 89.87% compared to Black Stone Minerals LP's net margin of 15.52%. Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 31.6% beat Hess Midstream LP's return on equity of 46.74%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hess Midstream LP has an analysts' consensus of $39.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.71%. Given that Hess Midstream LP has higher upside potential than Black Stone Minerals LP, analysts believe Hess Midstream LP is more attractive than Black Stone Minerals LP.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess Midstream LP has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.387%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.43%. Hess Midstream LP offers a yield of 7.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Black Stone Minerals LP pays 99.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess Midstream LP pays out 107.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Stone Minerals LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hess Midstream LP's is not.

Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $103.2M, which are smaller than Hess Midstream LP quarterly revenues of $377.6M. Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $92.7M is higher than Hess Midstream LP's net income of $58.6M. Notably, Black Stone Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.64x while Hess Midstream LP's PE ratio is 15.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Stone Minerals LP is 6.37x versus 2.00x for Hess Midstream LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MPLX LP has a net margin of 89.87% compared to Black Stone Minerals LP's net margin of 37.36%. Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 31.6% beat MPLX LP's return on equity of 31.81%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MPLX LP has an analysts' consensus of $51.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that MPLX LP has higher upside potential than Black Stone Minerals LP, analysts believe MPLX LP is more attractive than Black Stone Minerals LP.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPLX LP has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.634%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.43%. MPLX LP offers a yield of 7.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Black Stone Minerals LP pays 99.36% of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP pays out 83.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $103.2M, which are smaller than MPLX LP quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $92.7M is lower than MPLX LP's net income of $1B. Notably, Black Stone Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.64x while MPLX LP's PE ratio is 11.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Stone Minerals LP is 6.37x versus 4.46x for MPLX LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viper Energy has a net margin of 89.87% compared to Black Stone Minerals LP's net margin of 23.36%. Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 31.6% beat Viper Energy's return on equity of 7.18%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Viper Energy has an analysts' consensus of $58.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.07%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Black Stone Minerals LP, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Black Stone Minerals LP.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viper Energy has a beta of 1.717, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.693%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.43%. Viper Energy offers a yield of 5.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Black Stone Minerals LP pays 99.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy pays out 162.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Stone Minerals LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Viper Energy's is not.

Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $103.2M, which are smaller than Viper Energy quarterly revenues of $209.4M. Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $92.7M is higher than Viper Energy's net income of $48.9M. Notably, Black Stone Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.64x while Viper Energy's PE ratio is 20.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Stone Minerals LP is 6.37x versus 5.04x for Viper Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Midstream Partners LP has a net margin of 89.87% compared to Black Stone Minerals LP's net margin of 32.66%. Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 31.6% beat Western Midstream Partners LP's return on equity of 47.28%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Western Midstream Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $34.04 which suggests that it could grow by 5.01%. Given that Western Midstream Partners LP has higher upside potential than Black Stone Minerals LP, analysts believe Western Midstream Partners LP is more attractive than Black Stone Minerals LP.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Midstream Partners LP has a beta of 2.898, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.821%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.43%. Western Midstream Partners LP offers a yield of 8.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Black Stone Minerals LP pays 99.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Midstream Partners LP pays out 95.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $103.2M, which are smaller than Western Midstream Partners LP quarterly revenues of $883.4M. Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $92.7M is lower than Western Midstream Partners LP's net income of $288.5M. Notably, Black Stone Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.64x while Western Midstream Partners LP's PE ratio is 9.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Stone Minerals LP is 6.37x versus 4.15x for Western Midstream Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.