Financhill
Buy
58

BGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$7.40
Seasonality move :
10.95%
Day range:
$7.05 - $7.35
52-week range:
$5.45 - $11.79
Dividend yield:
10.43%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.30x
P/B ratio:
0.76x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
2.2M
1-year change:
-34.44%
Market cap:
$576.9M
Revenue:
$1.9B
EPS (TTM):
-$3.18

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BGS
B&G Foods
$548M $0.30 -3.33% 902.87% $7.29
ACU
Acme United
$42.1M -- 0.32% -- $58.00
CAG
Conagra Brands
$2.9B $0.54 -1.34% -15.18% $27.59
SENEA
Seneca Foods
-- -- -- -- --
SJM
JM Smucker
$2.2B $2.37 -1.01% -2.47% $119.34
UTZ
Utz Brands
$349.9M $0.19 -0.31% 5.74% $18.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BGS
B&G Foods
$7.29 $7.29 $576.9M -- $0.19 10.43% 0.30x
ACU
Acme United
$40.85 $58.00 $153.4M 16.81x $0.15 1.47% 0.87x
CAG
Conagra Brands
$25.65 $27.59 $12.2B 25.15x $0.35 5.46% 1.03x
SENEA
Seneca Foods
$84.64 -- $582.4M 15.17x $0.00 0% 0.39x
SJM
JM Smucker
$111.56 $119.34 $11.9B 22.09x $1.08 3.85% 1.69x
UTZ
Utz Brands
$13.30 $18.00 $1.1B 73.89x $0.06 1.79% 0.79x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BGS
B&G Foods
73.36% -1.811 -- 0.41x
ACU
Acme United
20.69% 1.078 19.91% 1.51x
CAG
Conagra Brands
49.02% -0.370 64.36% 0.20x
SENEA
Seneca Foods
39.81% 0.059 74.27% 0.31x
SJM
JM Smucker
53.19% 0.889 68.99% 0.21x
UTZ
Utz Brands
52.95% 0.496 40.08% 0.63x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BGS
B&G Foods
$118.7M $63.2M -8.86% -3.3% -46.36% $71.7M
ACU
Acme United
$17.8M $2.3M 7.49% 9.74% 5.05% $4.7M
CAG
Conagra Brands
$846.7M $402.6M 2.81% 5.56% 14.23% $403.2M
SENEA
Seneca Foods
$49.1M $25.6M 3.33% 6.45% 5.41% $108.7M
SJM
JM Smucker
$878.1M $468.8M -1.62% -3.42% -25.94% $151.3M
UTZ
Utz Brands
$119.4M $7.7M 0.72% 1.15% 6.84% $16.4M

B&G Foods vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BGS or ACU?

    Acme United has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 3.72%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Acme United's return on equity of 9.74%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    21.52% -$2.81 $2.8B
    ACU
    Acme United
    38.67% $0.41 $134.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About BGS or ACU?

    B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand Acme United has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.98%. Given that Acme United has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe Acme United is more attractive than B&G Foods.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0 5 2
    ACU
    Acme United
    1 0 0
  • Is BGS or ACU More Risky?

    B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acme United has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.072%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BGS or ACU?

    B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. Acme United offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United pays out 22.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BGS or ACU?

    B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are larger than Acme United quarterly revenues of $45.9M. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is lower than Acme United's net income of $1.7M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acme United's PE ratio is 16.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 0.87x for Acme United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0.30x -- $551.6M -$222.4M
    ACU
    Acme United
    0.87x 16.81x $45.9M $1.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns BGS or CAG?

    Conagra Brands has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 8.9%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    21.52% -$2.81 $2.8B
    CAG
    Conagra Brands
    26.5% $0.59 $17.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About BGS or CAG?

    B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $27.59 which suggests that it could grow by 8%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than B&G Foods.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0 5 2
    CAG
    Conagra Brands
    0 16 0
  • Is BGS or CAG More Risky?

    B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.180, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.014%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BGS or CAG?

    B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BGS or CAG?

    B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $3.2B. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 25.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 1.03x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0.30x -- $551.6M -$222.4M
    CAG
    Conagra Brands
    1.03x 25.15x $3.2B $284.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns BGS or SENEA?

    Seneca Foods has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 2.92%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Seneca Foods's return on equity of 6.45%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    21.52% -$2.81 $2.8B
    SENEA
    Seneca Foods
    9.77% $2.10 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BGS or SENEA?

    B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand Seneca Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0 5 2
    SENEA
    Seneca Foods
    0 0 0
  • Is BGS or SENEA More Risky?

    B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.163, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.667%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BGS or SENEA?

    B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. Seneca Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods pays out 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BGS or SENEA?

    B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are larger than Seneca Foods quarterly revenues of $502.9M. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is lower than Seneca Foods's net income of $14.7M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seneca Foods's PE ratio is 15.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 0.39x for Seneca Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0.30x -- $551.6M -$222.4M
    SENEA
    Seneca Foods
    0.39x 15.17x $502.9M $14.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns BGS or SJM?

    JM Smucker has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of -30.3%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    21.52% -$2.81 $2.8B
    SJM
    JM Smucker
    40.17% -$6.22 $14.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About BGS or SJM?

    B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $119.34 which suggests that it could grow by 6.97%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than B&G Foods.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0 5 2
    SJM
    JM Smucker
    3 14 0
  • Is BGS or SJM More Risky?

    B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.281, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.851%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BGS or SJM?

    B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BGS or SJM?

    B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are smaller than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 1.69x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0.30x -- $551.6M -$222.4M
    SJM
    JM Smucker
    1.69x 22.09x $2.2B -$662.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns BGS or UTZ?

    Utz Brands has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 0.68%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    21.52% -$2.81 $2.8B
    UTZ
    Utz Brands
    35.02% $0.03 $2.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About BGS or UTZ?

    B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand Utz Brands has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.34%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than B&G Foods.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0 5 2
    UTZ
    Utz Brands
    5 3 0
  • Is BGS or UTZ More Risky?

    B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Utz Brands has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.457%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BGS or UTZ?

    B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. Utz Brands offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Utz Brands pays out 136% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BGS or UTZ?

    B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are larger than Utz Brands quarterly revenues of $341M. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is lower than Utz Brands's net income of $2.3M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Utz Brands's PE ratio is 73.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 0.79x for Utz Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BGS
    B&G Foods
    0.30x -- $551.6M -$222.4M
    UTZ
    Utz Brands
    0.79x 73.89x $341M $2.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is the Market Going to Go Lower?
Is the Market Going to Go Lower?

The last month has been extremely difficult for the stock…

2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession
2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession

While many economists and investors initially expected 2025 to be…

Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?
Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?

There is a lot going on in the electric vehicle…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
49
SMTC alert for Mar 17

Semtech [SMTC] is down 0.49% over the past day.

Buy
62
PLPC alert for Mar 17

Preformed Line Products [PLPC] is up 3.8% over the past day.

Sell
50
NUTX alert for Mar 17

Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 4.82% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock