BGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 8.9%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $27.70 which suggests that it could grow by 8%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than B&G Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.180, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.014%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $3.2B. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 25.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 1.03x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seneca Foods has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 2.92%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Seneca Foods's return on equity of 6.45%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand Seneca Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that B&G Foods has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe B&G Foods is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.163, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.667%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. Seneca Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods pays out 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are larger than Seneca Foods quarterly revenues of $502.9M. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is lower than Seneca Foods's net income of $14.7M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seneca Foods's PE ratio is 15.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 0.39x for Seneca Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of -30.3%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $119.34 which suggests that it could grow by 6.97%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than B&G Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.281, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.851%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are smaller than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 1.69x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Utz Brands has a net margin of -40.32% compared to B&G Foods's net margin of 0.68%. B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3% beat Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.15%.

B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $7.29, signalling downside risk potential of -0.06%. On the other hand Utz Brands has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.34%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than B&G Foods.

B&G Foods has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Utz Brands has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.457%.

B&G Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.43%. Utz Brands offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. B&G Foods pays -23.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Utz Brands pays out 136% of its earnings as a dividend.

B&G Foods quarterly revenues are $551.6M, which are larger than Utz Brands quarterly revenues of $341M. B&G Foods's net income of -$222.4M is lower than Utz Brands's net income of $2.3M. Notably, B&G Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Utz Brands's PE ratio is 73.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for B&G Foods is 0.30x versus 0.79x for Utz Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.