ATHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bilibili has a net margin of 19.54% compared to Autohome's net margin of 1.16%. Autohome's return on equity of 7% beat Bilibili's return on equity of -9.64%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of $31.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.79%. On the other hand Bilibili has an analysts' consensus of $25.46 which suggests that it could grow by 57.27%. Given that Bilibili has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe Bilibili is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.163, which suggesting that the stock is 83.715% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bilibili has a beta of 0.955, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.548%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.74%. Bilibili offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 82.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Bilibili pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.9M, which are smaller than Bilibili quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Autohome's net income of $48.4M is higher than Bilibili's net income of $12.5M. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.78x while Bilibili's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.16x versus 1.80x for Bilibili. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheetah Mobile has a net margin of 19.54% compared to Autohome's net margin of -154.7%. Autohome's return on equity of 7% beat Cheetah Mobile's return on equity of -24.31%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of $31.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.79%. On the other hand Cheetah Mobile has an analysts' consensus of $6.40 which suggests that it could grow by 78.26%. Given that Cheetah Mobile has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe Cheetah Mobile is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.163, which suggesting that the stock is 83.715% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Mobile has a beta of 1.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.7%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.74%. Cheetah Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 82.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.9M, which are larger than Cheetah Mobile quarterly revenues of $33M. Autohome's net income of $48.4M is higher than Cheetah Mobile's net income of -$51M. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.78x while Cheetah Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.16x versus 0.96x for Cheetah Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phoenix New Media has a net margin of 19.54% compared to Autohome's net margin of -1.65%. Autohome's return on equity of 7% beat Phoenix New Media's return on equity of -4.73%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of $31.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.79%. On the other hand Phoenix New Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3368.21%. Given that Phoenix New Media has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe Phoenix New Media is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.163, which suggesting that the stock is 83.715% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phoenix New Media has a beta of 0.486, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.414%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.74%. Phoenix New Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 82.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Phoenix New Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.9M, which are larger than Phoenix New Media quarterly revenues of $30.3M. Autohome's net income of $48.4M is higher than Phoenix New Media's net income of -$499.4K. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.78x while Phoenix New Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.16x versus 0.21x for Phoenix New Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetEase has a net margin of 19.54% compared to Autohome's net margin of 32.78%. Autohome's return on equity of 7% beat NetEase's return on equity of 22.06%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of $31.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.79%. On the other hand NetEase has an analysts' consensus of $121.67 which suggests that it could grow by 24.91%. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.163, which suggesting that the stock is 83.715% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetEase has a beta of 0.651, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.948%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.74%. NetEase offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Autohome pays 82.62% of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase pays out 37.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.9M, which are smaller than NetEase quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Autohome's net income of $48.4M is lower than NetEase's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.78x while NetEase's PE ratio is 15.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.16x versus 4.29x for NetEase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.