ARES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of 11.03% compared to Ares Management's net margin of 26.04%. Ares Management's return on equity of 8.82% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 14.74%.

Ares Management has a consensus price target of $164.86, signalling upside risk potential of 19.69%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $160.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26.33%. Given that Blackstone has higher upside potential than Ares Management, analysts believe Blackstone is more attractive than Ares Management.

Ares Management has a beta of 1.318, which suggesting that the stock is 31.82% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.611, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.056%.

Ares Management has a quarterly dividend of $1.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Blackstone offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.44 per share. Ares Management pays 282.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ares Management quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Ares Management's net income of $177.3M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $703.9M. Notably, Ares Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.85x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 35.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ares Management is 7.02x versus 8.92x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Carlyle Group has a net margin of 11.03% compared to Ares Management's net margin of 27.34%. Ares Management's return on equity of 8.82% beat The Carlyle Group's return on equity of 17.04%.

Ares Management has a consensus price target of $164.86, signalling upside risk potential of 19.69%. On the other hand The Carlyle Group has an analysts' consensus of $50.18 which suggests that it could grow by 38.49%. Given that The Carlyle Group has higher upside potential than Ares Management, analysts believe The Carlyle Group is more attractive than Ares Management.

Ares Management has a beta of 1.318, which suggesting that the stock is 31.82% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.720, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.98%.

Ares Management has a quarterly dividend of $1.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. The Carlyle Group offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Ares Management pays 282.68% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ares Management's is not.

Ares Management quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than The Carlyle Group quarterly revenues of $771.3M. Ares Management's net income of $177.3M is lower than The Carlyle Group's net income of $210.9M. Notably, Ares Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.85x while The Carlyle Group's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ares Management is 7.02x versus 3.92x for The Carlyle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 11.03% compared to Ares Management's net margin of 29.64%. Ares Management's return on equity of 8.82% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 11.93%.

Ares Management has a consensus price target of $164.86, signalling upside risk potential of 19.69%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $608.26 which suggests that it could grow by 23.02%. Given that The Goldman Sachs Group has higher upside potential than Ares Management, analysts believe The Goldman Sachs Group is more attractive than Ares Management.

Ares Management has a beta of 1.318, which suggesting that the stock is 31.82% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.076%.

Ares Management has a quarterly dividend of $1.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Ares Management pays 282.68% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 31.5% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ares Management's is not.

Ares Management quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $13.9B. Ares Management's net income of $177.3M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $4.1B. Notably, Ares Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.85x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 12.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ares Management is 7.02x versus 3.08x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of 11.03% compared to Ares Management's net margin of 35.17%. Ares Management's return on equity of 8.82% beat KKR &'s return on equity of 5.17%.

Ares Management has a consensus price target of $164.86, signalling upside risk potential of 19.69%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $143.62 which suggests that it could grow by 41.58%. Given that KKR & has higher upside potential than Ares Management, analysts believe KKR & is more attractive than Ares Management.

Ares Management has a beta of 1.318, which suggesting that the stock is 31.82% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.770, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.003%.

Ares Management has a quarterly dividend of $1.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Ares Management pays 282.68% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ares Management's is not.

Ares Management quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than KKR & quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Ares Management's net income of $177.3M is lower than KKR &'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Ares Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.85x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 30.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ares Management is 7.02x versus 4.40x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.