AGO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hiscox has a net margin of 67.86% compared to Assured Guaranty's net margin of --. Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 13.05% beat Hiscox's return on equity of 22.74%.

Assured Guaranty has a consensus price target of $106.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.92%. On the other hand Hiscox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than Hiscox, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than Hiscox.

Assured Guaranty has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hiscox has a beta of 0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.156%.

Assured Guaranty has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Hiscox offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Assured Guaranty pays 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Hiscox pays out 17.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues are $252M, which are larger than Hiscox quarterly revenues of --. Assured Guaranty's net income of $171M is higher than Hiscox's net income of --. Notably, Assured Guaranty's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.95x while Hiscox's PE ratio is 6.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Assured Guaranty is 5.32x versus 1.33x for Hiscox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 67.86% compared to Assured Guaranty's net margin of -402.57%. Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 13.05% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39%.

Assured Guaranty has a consensus price target of $106.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.92%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Assured Guaranty, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Assured Guaranty.

Assured Guaranty has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.051%.

Assured Guaranty has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Assured Guaranty pays 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues are $252M, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Assured Guaranty's net income of $171M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Assured Guaranty's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.95x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Assured Guaranty is 5.32x versus 1.56x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of 67.86% compared to Assured Guaranty's net margin of 29.8%. Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 13.05% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92%.

Assured Guaranty has a consensus price target of $106.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.92%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $289.09 which suggests that it could grow by 14.12%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

Assured Guaranty has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.478%.

Assured Guaranty has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Assured Guaranty pays 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues are $252M, which are smaller than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $4B. Assured Guaranty's net income of $171M is lower than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Assured Guaranty's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.95x while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 3.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Assured Guaranty is 5.32x versus 1.04x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiriusPoint has a net margin of 67.86% compared to Assured Guaranty's net margin of 1.52%. Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 13.05% beat SiriusPoint's return on equity of 12.28%.

Assured Guaranty has a consensus price target of $106.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.92%. On the other hand SiriusPoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.04%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than SiriusPoint, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than SiriusPoint.

Assured Guaranty has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiriusPoint has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.98%.

Assured Guaranty has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. SiriusPoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Assured Guaranty pays 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusPoint pays out 4.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues are $252M, which are smaller than SiriusPoint quarterly revenues of $559.2M. Assured Guaranty's net income of $171M is higher than SiriusPoint's net income of $8.5M. Notably, Assured Guaranty's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.95x while SiriusPoint's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Assured Guaranty is 5.32x versus 1.01x for SiriusPoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.