RLGT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 1.66% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of 7.65%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 4.05% beat Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 31.54%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.63%. On the other hand Expeditors International of Washington has an analysts' consensus of $116.47 which suggests that it could grow by 4.47%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.52%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expeditors International of Washington offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are smaller than Expeditors International of Washington quarterly revenues of $3B. Radiant Logistics's net income of $3.4M is lower than Expeditors International of Washington's net income of $229.6M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.76x while Expeditors International of Washington's PE ratio is 21.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.40x versus 1.61x for Expeditors International of Washington. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air has a net margin of 1.66% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of -11.19%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 4.05% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -98.01%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.63%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.7%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than Forward Air, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than Forward Air.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.748%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are smaller than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $655.9M. Radiant Logistics's net income of $3.4M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$73.4M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.76x while Forward Air's PE ratio is 10.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.40x versus 0.35x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of 1.66% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of 2.39%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 4.05% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.65%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.63%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $48.13 which suggests that it could grow by 11.58%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than Hub Group, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than Hub Group.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.408%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are smaller than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $986.9M. Radiant Logistics's net income of $3.4M is lower than Hub Group's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.76x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 24.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.40x versus 0.67x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Singularity Future Technology has a net margin of 1.66% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of -191.82%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 4.05% beat Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -36.46%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.63%. On the other hand Singularity Future Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 469.25%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.188%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Singularity Future Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singularity Future Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are larger than Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues of $501.4K. Radiant Logistics's net income of $3.4M is higher than Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$961.8K. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.76x while Singularity Future Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.40x versus 1.64x for Singularity Future Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.