MI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Millennium Group International Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to NFT's net margin of --. NFT's return on equity of -- beat Millennium Group International Holdings's return on equity of -23.75%.

NFT has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Millennium Group International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NFT has higher upside potential than Millennium Group International Holdings, analysts believe NFT is more attractive than Millennium Group International Holdings.

NFT has a beta of 2.834, which suggesting that the stock is 183.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Millennium Group International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NFT has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Millennium Group International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NFT pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Millennium Group International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NFT quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Millennium Group International Holdings quarterly revenues of --. NFT's net income of -- is lower than Millennium Group International Holdings's net income of --. Notably, NFT's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Millennium Group International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NFT is -- versus 0.42x for Millennium Group International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of -- compared to NFT's net margin of 2.32%. NFT's return on equity of -- beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

NFT has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $9.49 which suggests that it could grow by 51.22%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than NFT.

NFT has a beta of 2.834, which suggesting that the stock is 183.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.817%.

NFT has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NFT pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out -0.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

NFT quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. NFT's net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $27.3M. Notably, NFT's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NFT is -- versus 0.59x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -- compared to NFT's net margin of 0.33%. NFT's return on equity of -- beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92%.

NFT has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 578.73%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than NFT.

NFT has a beta of 2.834, which suggesting that the stock is 183.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.913%.

NFT has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 18.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. NFT pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend.

NFT quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. NFT's net income of -- is lower than Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K. Notably, NFT's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 60.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NFT is -- versus 1.18x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of -- compared to NFT's net margin of --. NFT's return on equity of -- beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.

NFT has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NFT has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe NFT is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.

NFT has a beta of 2.834, which suggesting that the stock is 183.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NFT has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NFT pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NFT quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. NFT's net income of -- is lower than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, NFT's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NFT is -- versus 5.47x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.