Down 50%, Is Dell Technologies a Buy?
Dell (NYSE:DELL)’s share price has been on a roller coaster…
Sell
45
EVM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.08
Seasonality move
:
0.75%
Day range:
$9.05 - $9.29
52-week range:
$9.05 - $9.81
Dividend yield:
5.42%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
53.6K
Avg. volume:
72.9K
1-year change:
-2.74%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
$5.4M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
$9.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 5.42% | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
$10.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 6.6% | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
$9.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 5.96% | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
$5.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 4.73% | -- |
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
$8.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 5.1% | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
$6.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 5.64% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | 1.250 | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | 1.660 | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | 1.723 | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | 2.314 | -- | -- |
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 1.957 | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | 2.274 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EVM or BFZ?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a net margin of -- compared to Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net margin of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of -- beat Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EVM or BFZ?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has higher upside potential than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr, analysts believe Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is more attractive than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 -
Is EVM or BFZ More Risky?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.994%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EVM or BFZ?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr offers a yield of 6.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EVM or BFZ?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of -- is lower than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of --. Notably, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is -- versus -- for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -- BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EVM or CEV?
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net margin of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EVM or CEV?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust, analysts believe Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust0 0 0 -
Is EVM or CEV More Risky?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has a beta of 2.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.25%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EVM or CEV?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust offers a yield of 5.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EVM or CEV?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -- CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EVM or PCK?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has a net margin of -- compared to Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net margin of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EVM or PCK?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II, analysts believe Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II0 0 0 -
Is EVM or PCK More Risky?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has a beta of 2.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.529%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EVM or PCK?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II offers a yield of 4.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EVM or PCK?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II quarterly revenues of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's net income of --. Notably, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -- PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EVM or PCQ?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net margin of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EVM or PCQ?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund, analysts believe Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is more attractive than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is EVM or PCQ More Risky?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.329%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EVM or PCQ?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund offers a yield of 5.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EVM or PCQ?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -- PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EVM or PZC?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a net margin of -- compared to Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net margin of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EVM or PZC?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III, analysts believe Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III0 0 0 -
Is EVM or PZC More Risky?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.008, which suggesting that the stock is 100.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.954%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EVM or PZC?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III offers a yield of 5.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EVM or PZC?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III quarterly revenues of --. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's net income of --. Notably, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
How Bad Will the Stock Market Get?
In recent trading days, global stock markets have seen massive…
Is JOBY Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Joby Aviation (NYSE:JOBY) got started with the big idea of…
Stock Ideas
Sell
36
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
30
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Sell
33
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
55
SLNO alert for Apr 9
Soleno Therapeutics [SLNO] is up 0.46% over the past day.
Sell
20
HELE alert for Apr 9
Helen Of Troy [HELE] is up 0.94% over the past day.
Sell
18
OXM alert for Apr 9
Oxford Industries [OXM] is up 2.93% over the past day.
