WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 11.27% compared to Woodward's net margin of -25.36%. Woodward's return on equity of 16.72% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $196.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $193.12 which suggests that it could grow by 21.25%. Given that Boeing has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Boeing is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.328% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.789%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $772.7M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $15.2B. Woodward's net income of $87.1M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$3.9B. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.48x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.18x versus 1.55x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ducommun has a net margin of 11.27% compared to Woodward's net margin of 3.43%. Woodward's return on equity of 16.72% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $196.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $81.60 which suggests that it could grow by 44.68%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.328% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.313%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $772.7M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $197.3M. Woodward's net income of $87.1M is higher than Ducommun's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.48x while Ducommun's PE ratio is 26.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.18x versus 1.08x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 11.27% compared to Woodward's net margin of 16.61%. Woodward's return on equity of 16.72% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 26.91%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $196.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $139.23 which suggests that it could grow by 9.24%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Woodward has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.328% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.578%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $772.7M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Woodward's net income of $87.1M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $314M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.48x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 45.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.18x versus 7.04x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 11.27% compared to Woodward's net margin of 6.85%. Woodward's return on equity of 16.72% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $196.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $140.38 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than RTX.

Woodward has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.328% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. RTX offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $772.7M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. Woodward's net income of $87.1M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.48x while RTX's PE ratio is 36.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.18x versus 2.15x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.