WMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of 2.52% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 2.04%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 73.95% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 4.66%.

Warner Music Group has a consensus price target of $35.63, signalling upside risk potential of 20.38%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $123.99 which suggests that it could grow by 14.67%. Given that Warner Music Group has higher upside potential than The Walt Disney, analysts believe Warner Music Group is more attractive than The Walt Disney.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.777%.

Warner Music Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Warner Music Group pays 82.99% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warner Music Group quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $22.6B. Warner Music Group's net income of $41M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $460M. Notably, Warner Music Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.66x while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 39.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warner Music Group is 2.38x versus 2.16x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Formula One Group has a net margin of 2.52% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 12.84%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 73.95% beat Liberty Formula One Group's return on equity of 4.15%.

Warner Music Group has a consensus price target of $35.63, signalling upside risk potential of 20.38%. On the other hand Liberty Formula One Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.08%. Given that Warner Music Group has higher upside potential than Liberty Formula One Group, analysts believe Warner Music Group is more attractive than Liberty Formula One Group.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Formula One Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Warner Music Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Liberty Formula One Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Warner Music Group pays 82.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Formula One Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warner Music Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warner Music Group quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Liberty Formula One Group quarterly revenues of $911M. Warner Music Group's net income of $41M is lower than Liberty Formula One Group's net income of $117M. Notably, Warner Music Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.66x while Liberty Formula One Group's PE ratio is 73.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warner Music Group is 2.38x versus 5.47x for Liberty Formula One Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of 2.52% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of -5.38%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 73.95% beat Gaia's return on equity of -6.96%.

Warner Music Group has a consensus price target of $35.63, signalling upside risk potential of 20.38%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.17 which suggests that it could grow by 94.45%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Warner Music Group, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Warner Music Group.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.473%.

Warner Music Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Warner Music Group pays 82.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warner Music Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warner Music Group quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $22.2M. Warner Music Group's net income of $41M is higher than Gaia's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Warner Music Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.66x while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warner Music Group is 2.38x versus 1.13x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 2.52% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 0.02%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 73.95% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -26.78%.

Warner Music Group has a consensus price target of $35.63, signalling upside risk potential of 20.38%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.71 which suggests that it could grow by 19.09%. Given that Warner Music Group has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Warner Music Group is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.127%.

Warner Music Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.37%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Warner Music Group pays 82.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -73.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Warner Music Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Warner Music Group quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Warner Music Group's net income of $41M is higher than Paramount Global's net income of $1M. Notably, Warner Music Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.66x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Warner Music Group is 2.38x versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.